2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.690902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should Coercive Interrogation Be Legal?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…83 This formula equally weighted property, payroll and sales factors. 84 In 1957, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws 85 drafted the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (UDIPTA), which was intended to serve as the model for state corporate income tax laws. 86 Unlike previous uniformity efforts, UDIPTA provided rules for measuring the factors used in the recommended formula and special rules for particularly problematic categories of income.…”
Section: Formulary Taxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…83 This formula equally weighted property, payroll and sales factors. 84 In 1957, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws 85 drafted the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (UDIPTA), which was intended to serve as the model for state corporate income tax laws. 86 Unlike previous uniformity efforts, UDIPTA provided rules for measuring the factors used in the recommended formula and special rules for particularly problematic categories of income.…”
Section: Formulary Taxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at 10. 84 See id. 85 The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws is a non-profit, unincorporated association which has been drafting uniform laws for adoption by state legislatures since 1882.…”
Section: Formulary Taxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…83 (To the extent that the international relations canons operate as part of Step One, they trump executive power under Chevron -a proposition on which we shall cast some doubt. 84 ) But sometimes those sources will leave gaps; Chevron itself is such a case, and there are many others. If the Court's analysis is accepted on this point, its deference principle seems readily understandable; we shall shortly investigate its relationship to the international relations doctrines.…”
Section: Executive Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…83 The court was, however, unwilling to assume sole responsibility for designing a system of candidate disclosure: "where there is inaction by the executive, for whatever reason, the judiciary must step in, in exercise of its constitutional obligations to provide a solution"-but just until the legislature enacts "proper legislation to cover the field." 84 It forced action while drawing on the proposals of others and leaving room for supplanting legislation. India may have a weak record of protecting controversial private speech, 85 but its courts found a way to encourage a measure of official openness.…”
Section: Judicial Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%