2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should anthropometric differences between the commonly used pedestrian computational biomechanics models and Chinese population be taken into account when predicting pedestrian head kinematics and injury in vehicle collisions in China?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the reconstruction results, the position of contact between the pedestrian’s right shoulder and the shattered windshield of the vehicle, the position of impact between the pedestrian’s injured right leg and the vehicle’s bumper, and the position of impact between the pedestrian’s head and the ground matched the video data for the real accident, proving that the reconstruction was accurate. The simulation results showed that the value of HIC was 1882.9, predicting a 96% probability of AIS3 head injury according to relevant studies ( Li and Zhu, 2009 ; Gao et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2021b ; Wang et al, 2022a ), which was consistent with the death of pedestrians due to severe craniocerebral injury in this accident. Relevant studies ( Hu et al, 2020 ) showed that the range of forces leading to femur fracture was 3 kN–10 kN.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In the reconstruction results, the position of contact between the pedestrian’s right shoulder and the shattered windshield of the vehicle, the position of impact between the pedestrian’s injured right leg and the vehicle’s bumper, and the position of impact between the pedestrian’s head and the ground matched the video data for the real accident, proving that the reconstruction was accurate. The simulation results showed that the value of HIC was 1882.9, predicting a 96% probability of AIS3 head injury according to relevant studies ( Li and Zhu, 2009 ; Gao et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2021b ; Wang et al, 2022a ), which was consistent with the death of pedestrians due to severe craniocerebral injury in this accident. Relevant studies ( Hu et al, 2020 ) showed that the range of forces leading to femur fracture was 3 kN–10 kN.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…At the same time, drivers’ eye movements are linked to their brain activities, and it was found that mental fatigue could influence the dynamics of saccadic eye movements. Although drivers’ accident mechanism can be analyzed from different perspectives [ 52 , 53 ], it is more important to analyze the mechanism from visual and physiological perspectives. Specifically, in future studies, drivers’ eye movement data should also be used to quantify their brain activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This accident has detailed photos of the accident scene, police traffic accident scene map, injury report, vehicle trace deformation, and other information. The details of the accident collision process is as follows: the location of the accident is a two-way four lane, the weather is light rain, and the ground is the wet asphalt pavement; a small offset collision of 25% occurs between the left front of a minivan and the left front of a sedan; when the collision occurs, the collision velocity of the minivan is 54 km/h ( Liu et al, 2017b ; Wang et al, 2022a ), and the driver uses the seat belt, but without the airbag. The abridged injury scale (AIS), which was amended in 2005, was used to categorize the injury information of the drivers involved in the accidents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%