2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2003.11.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should acid ammonium oxalate replace hydroxylammonium chloride in step 2 of the revised BCR sequential extraction protocol for soil and sediment?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selection of the most appropriate sequential extraction protocol for use in a particular study must always be carried out on the basis of ''fitness for purpose'' criterion. However, the revised BCR protocol, involving use of 0.5 mol/l NH 2 OHÁHCl in the reducible step, appears to be more generally applicable than procedures involving acid ammonium oxalate (Davidson et al 2004). A 1 g sample, taken from the prepared samples, was moved to a centrifuging tube, and each extraction reagent was added, respectively, in the following process:…”
Section: Sequential Extraction Of Chemical Speciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selection of the most appropriate sequential extraction protocol for use in a particular study must always be carried out on the basis of ''fitness for purpose'' criterion. However, the revised BCR protocol, involving use of 0.5 mol/l NH 2 OHÁHCl in the reducible step, appears to be more generally applicable than procedures involving acid ammonium oxalate (Davidson et al 2004). A 1 g sample, taken from the prepared samples, was moved to a centrifuging tube, and each extraction reagent was added, respectively, in the following process:…”
Section: Sequential Extraction Of Chemical Speciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prepared samples were analyzed for the chemical speciation of Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn using a BCR (European Community Bureau of Reference) modified sequential (Ure et al 1993;Rauret et al 1999;Davidson et al 2004;Wang et al 2005). Selection of the most appropriate sequential extraction protocol for use in a particular study must always be carried out on the basis of ''fitness for purpose'' criterion.…”
Section: Sequential Extraction Of Chemical Speciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the 0.5 mol L À1 NH 2 OH-HCl (pH 1.5) method which was adopted to extract heavy metals in the reducible fraction of mBCR method is currently the most important extraction method for heavy metals from Mn and Fe oxides in soils. This extraction procedure targets metals occluded in Fe and Mn oxyhydroxides, and the amount of Fe extracted is less than the amount of oxalate-extractable Fe (Davidson et al 2004); however, the results vary greatly among samples. Adoption of the standardized mBCR method for fractionation of heavy metals might be desirable to increase the comparability of data among studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive loading between Ca3, Cr3, and Pb3 can be explained by the fact that these metals could have made sparingly soluble oxalate complexes (Walsh and O'Halloran 1996;Gleyzes et al 2002;Davidson et al 2004;Doelsch et al 2008).…”
Section: Metal Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 97%