2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-011-0262-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shot boundary detection in the presence of illumination and motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For fair comparisons, we determine the action score of each proposal by applying the AS classifier obtained by our best model (trained with all three methods). ( 6) Shot boundary detection methods [5,65,53] detect the change boundaries in the video which can be considered as AS proposals. Then we utilize our best classifier to classify each AS proposal.…”
Section: Results On Thumos'14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fair comparisons, we determine the action score of each proposal by applying the AS classifier obtained by our best model (trained with all three methods). ( 6) Shot boundary detection methods [5,65,53] detect the change boundaries in the video which can be considered as AS proposals. Then we utilize our best classifier to classify each AS proposal.…”
Section: Results On Thumos'14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the block loss happened in the frame is not the key frame then we can use bidirectional predication and else we restrict the algorithm as a unidirectional prediction. Literature gives multiple algorithms for the video shot boundary detection [8,9]. We use correlation between consecutive frames as a measure for shot boundary detection,…”
Section: Error Concealmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughly speaking, abrupt cuts are more prevailing than gradual transitions in a video which accounts for >99% of all transitions [6]. Again, despite many cut detection algorithms proposed in the literature [7–10], limited efforts have been paid on detecting cuts in the presence of dramatic light variation such as flashlight affecting one frame to several frames, fire effects such as fire affecting a small area to the full frames, flicker with gradually varying intensity and fast/shaky camera/object motion [11–13]. The primary challenge in any cut detection process is a selection of a feature as well as a threshold which could be able to discriminate between variations due to the above‐mentioned effects and variation due to the actual scene change similar to the human visual system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%