2001
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<2144:sffsmr>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shortwave Flux from Satellite-Measured Radiance: A Theoretical Study over Marine Boundary Layer Clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the illumination effects of bumpy cloud topography exceed the shadowing effects, as might be expected for such a high backscattering angle, an overall increase in the nadir reflectance can occur. While this finding is not particularly surprising, it contrasts with a nadir radiance minimum found in previous studies, attributed to radiative smoothing [e.g., Zuidema and Evans , 1998; Várnai , 2000; Chambers et al , 2001; Iwabuchi and Hayasaka , 2002]. These studies all utilized a Lambertian surface; we produce a similar result when we utilize a Lambertian surface (not shown).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the illumination effects of bumpy cloud topography exceed the shadowing effects, as might be expected for such a high backscattering angle, an overall increase in the nadir reflectance can occur. While this finding is not particularly surprising, it contrasts with a nadir radiance minimum found in previous studies, attributed to radiative smoothing [e.g., Zuidema and Evans , 1998; Várnai , 2000; Chambers et al , 2001; Iwabuchi and Hayasaka , 2002]. These studies all utilized a Lambertian surface; we produce a similar result when we utilize a Lambertian surface (not shown).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The method outlined by Chambers et al [2001] is followed, with the change that the cloud thickness is known, and the parameter A in L ( z ) = Az , where L ( z ) is the mass of liquid water per unit volume of air, is adjusted so that the optical depth of the column matches the original retrieval. The extinction coefficient depends on height according to β( z ) = 2π(0.001)[ r e ( z )] 2 N , where β, r e , and N denote the volume extinction coefficient in inverse kilometers, the effective radius in microns, and an assumed number concentration of 100 cm −3 , respectively.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Reflectance Simulations Using a Vertically Incrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the uncertainty values are not necessarily determined by a rigorous analysis of the error because when the algorithm was implemented for CERES production, the error in retrieved properties at a pixel resolution was not well understood quantitatively. For example, although earlier studies thought the error in retrieved cloud fraction and optical thickness depended on solar zenith, viewing, and relative azimuth angles (e.g., Loeb et al 1998;Zuidema and Evans 1998;Chambers et al 2001;Vámai and Marshak 2001;Kato et al 2006), the error also depends on cloud type, which makes the quantitative estimate of instantaneous error extremely difficult. Recent Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) and CloudSat observations provide an opportunity to assess retrieved cloud properties from passive instruments.…”
Section: Input Variable Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical Part I study aims at obtaining a flux retrieval model to be consistent with the instantaneous TQA flux accuracy of current Earth Radiation Budget (ERB) missions. However, it must be considered that the inversion to flux using theoretical AMD models retrieves large flux bias errors (Chambers et al 2001). Toward the creation of an efficient radiance-toflux conversion, the algorithms developed in Part I utilize the three BBR observation angles simultaneously in the flux inversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%