2007 IEEE 7th International Symposium on BioInformatics and BioEngineering 2007
DOI: 10.1109/bibe.2007.4375584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shortest Path Approaches for the Longest Common Subsequence of a Set of Strings

Abstract: Abstract-We investigate the k-LCS problem that is finding a longest common subsequence (LCS) for k given input strings. The problem is known to have practical solutions for k = 2, but for higher dimensions it is not very well explored. We consider the algorithms by Miller and Myers as well as Wu et al. which solve the 2-LCS problem, and shed a new light on their generalization to higher dimensions. First, we redesign both algorithms such that the generalization to higher dimensions becomes natural. Then we pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent breakthrough, Abboud et al [1] proved that the existence of an algorithm with running time O(n k−ε ), for any ε > 0, would contradict the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. As far as the space complexity is concerned, only modest progress has been achieved: The best known result is an algorithm of Barsky et al [8], which improves the space complexity to O(n k−1 ). This motivates us to formulate the following conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent breakthrough, Abboud et al [1] proved that the existence of an algorithm with running time O(n k−ε ), for any ε > 0, would contradict the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. As far as the space complexity is concerned, only modest progress has been achieved: The best known result is an algorithm of Barsky et al [8], which improves the space complexity to O(n k−1 ). This motivates us to formulate the following conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%