Proceedings of the 19th International Database Engineering &Amp; Applications Symposium on - IDEAS '15 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2790755.2790767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shortest Average-Distance Query on Heterogeneous Neighboring Objects

Abstract: Currently, most of the processing techniques for the conventional location-based queries focus only on a single type of objects. However, in real-life applications the user may be interested in obtaining information about different types of objects, in terms of their neighboring relationship. We term the different types of objects closer to each other the heterogeneous neighboring objects (HNOs for short). Efficient processing of the location-based queries on the HNOs is more complicated than that on a single … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation shows that the WSOU algorithm outperforms the CdSQ algorithm by a factor of 1.5 to three in terms of the CPU time. The large difference in CPU time between the two algorithms comes from: (1) for the CdSQ algorithm, the query re-execution at each update is inevitable, no matter what the number of objects changing attributes is (that is why its cost keeps almost constant); while (2) for the WSOU algorithm, the query re-execution can be avoided by determining which of the objects changing attributes fall outside the distance range d and by only updating the affected query result if necessary, utilizing the OADM, the RDSL and the SOET.…”
Section: Effect Of Time-varying Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation shows that the WSOU algorithm outperforms the CdSQ algorithm by a factor of 1.5 to three in terms of the CPU time. The large difference in CPU time between the two algorithms comes from: (1) for the CdSQ algorithm, the query re-execution at each update is inevitable, no matter what the number of objects changing attributes is (that is why its cost keeps almost constant); while (2) for the WSOU algorithm, the query re-execution can be avoided by determining which of the objects changing attributes fall outside the distance range d and by only updating the affected query result if necessary, utilizing the OADM, the RDSL and the SOET.…”
Section: Effect Of Time-varying Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the fast advance of positioning techniques in mobile systems and the popularization of portable computers (e.g., laptops, 3G mobile phones and tablet PCs), spatio-temporal databases that aim at efficiently managing a large number of moving objects so as to support various types of location-based queries have attracted much attention in the database community [1][2][3][4]. Many applications, such as geographical information systems, traffic control systems and location-aware advertisements, can benefit from efficient processing of the location-based queries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%