2015
DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtv049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shortened anther–stigma distance reduces compatible pollination in two distylousPrimulaspecies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the disassortative hypothesis, pollen grains from the anthers in different positions in a flower are likely to be attached to different parts of a pollinator’s body and thus transferred to the stigmas of opposite morphs ( Olesen 1979 ; Wolfe and Barrett 1987 ; Brys et al 2008 ). Many approaches, such as using man-made flowers as the pollen receptor ( Stone and Thomson 1994 ), manually changing the herkogamy of the flower ( Liu et al 2015 ), or controlling the pollinator when it visits the flowers of cultivated plants ( Keller et al 2014 ) have generally supported the hypothesis, but these approaches might affect the pollinator’s behaviour, such as the duration per visit and the foraging preference. Meanwhile, notably more pollen grains were deposited on the stigma when a controlled pollinator visited the flower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the disassortative hypothesis, pollen grains from the anthers in different positions in a flower are likely to be attached to different parts of a pollinator’s body and thus transferred to the stigmas of opposite morphs ( Olesen 1979 ; Wolfe and Barrett 1987 ; Brys et al 2008 ). Many approaches, such as using man-made flowers as the pollen receptor ( Stone and Thomson 1994 ), manually changing the herkogamy of the flower ( Liu et al 2015 ), or controlling the pollinator when it visits the flowers of cultivated plants ( Keller et al 2014 ) have generally supported the hypothesis, but these approaches might affect the pollinator’s behaviour, such as the duration per visit and the foraging preference. Meanwhile, notably more pollen grains were deposited on the stigma when a controlled pollinator visited the flower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies examined the disassortative pollination hypothesis using manipulating experiment ( Keller et al 2014 ) or molecular methods ( Zhou et al 2015 ). Most studies quantified disassortative pollen movement by analysing pollen deposition on stigmas under natural conditions ( Ganders 1976 ; Ornduff 1979 ; Nishihiro et al 2000 ; Valois-Cuesta et al 2011 ; Liu et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, most studies of the Primula SI system have focused on differences in pollination behaviors between morphs, such as the roles of bumblebee nectar robbers and syrphid flies in P. secundiflora pollination, the strength of SI and distylous syndrome in P. veris , the effect of anther–stigma distance on stigma pollen grains in two Primula species, and the relationship between flower display and SI in P. tibetica [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. However, little is known about the biological events that occur during the process of Primula SI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have proposed that dioecy evolves from heterostyly when pollen transfer between floral morphs is highly asymmetrical (Ornduff 1966, Beach & Bawa 1980. The classical Darwinian explanation for the transition to dioecy from distyly proposes that the pollinator-driven asymmetrical pollen transfer between floral morphs, resulting from low reciprocity among sexual organs (e.g., Feinsinger & Busby 1987, Lau & Bosque 2003, Ornelas et al 2004a, Stone & Thomson 1994, Hernández & Ornelas 2007a, García-Robledo 2008 and lower accessibility of low-level sexual organs and pollinator behavior (Liu et al 2016, Yuan et al 2017, would favor maleness in the morph with higher pollen donation efficiency (usually SS), and femaleness in the morph receiving more legitimate pollen (usually LS) (Darwin 1877, Ornduff 1966, Lloyd 1979, Beach & Bawa 1980. Asymmetries in pollen flow might be an important first step towards gender specialization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%