Short Uncemented Femoral Component for Hip Revision: Prognosis and Risk Factors Associated With Failure

Abstract

BackgroundThe application of short uncemented femoral stem is partially restricted in revision surgery. In some patients with mild to moderate bone deficiency, short uncemented stem is certainly a choice. This study will demonstrate the therapeutic effect and unsuitable situation for short uncemented stem revision.MethodsPatients who undergone hip revision from January 2005 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Preoperative radiological images were evaluated to help estimating the bone deficiency around hip joint. Mann-Whitney U test was performed for comparison between continuous variables. Chi-square test was performed for comparison between categorical variables. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association between potential risk factors and failure of revision surgery.ResultsA total of 381 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The mean follow-up time was 71.05±16.54 months. The mean time from primary revision surgery to secondary revision surgery was 16.41±17.47 months. According to the survival status of femoral component at final follow-up, patients were divided into two groups. Cox regression analysis revealed that the risk for revision failure approximately increased by 5.6% for every year of age increase (HR=1.056, 95%CI=1.012–1.102). Osteoporosis was another independent risk factor for revision failure (HR=2.802, 95%CI=1.097–7.157). The strongest risk factor was intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture during revision surgery in this study (HR=5.477, 95%CI=2.156–13.913).ConclusionThree risk factors for failure are identified, such as aging, osteoporosis and intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture during revision surgery. Therefore, short uncemented femoral stem should be implanted in these patients with additional caution.