1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(98)00452-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term understory plant community responses to timber-harvesting intensity on non-industrial private forestlands in Pennsylvania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
53
3
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
18
53
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We found a trivial change in species composition and cover of the entire understory plant community in the control plots 2 years after clear-cut logging; these findings were consistent with previous studies employing a before-after methodology for the vascular plant community (Fredericksen et al 1999) and for the ground bryophyte community in the uncut quadrats 4 years after forest harvest (Fenton et al 2003). Thus, we corroborated the observations that the ground flora are characterized by a dynamic equilibrium and the community structure displays dynamic fluctuation in old-growth forests (Økland 1994).…”
Section: Short-term Responsessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We found a trivial change in species composition and cover of the entire understory plant community in the control plots 2 years after clear-cut logging; these findings were consistent with previous studies employing a before-after methodology for the vascular plant community (Fredericksen et al 1999) and for the ground bryophyte community in the uncut quadrats 4 years after forest harvest (Fenton et al 2003). Thus, we corroborated the observations that the ground flora are characterized by a dynamic equilibrium and the community structure displays dynamic fluctuation in old-growth forests (Økland 1994).…”
Section: Short-term Responsessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…More detailed studies of the responses to selection harvest of these species, with their particularly high conservation value, are necessary (cf. Fredericksen et al 1999). Species richness of the summer aspect increased with harvest severity (Fig.…”
Section: Species Response To Selection Harvestmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Contrary to the IDH, a monotonic increase of species richness with harvest intensity has been observed (Thomas et al 1999;Zenner et al 2006), lending support to the speciesenergy hypothesis (Rosenzweig 1995). It has frequently been found that a threshold of harvest intensity had to be reached before there was a response in understorey species richness (Fredericksen et al 1999;Kern et al 2006). From these results it might be hypothesized that, compared to unmanaged forests, harvest treatments at the lower end of the harvest intensity gradient may have no signiWcant eVect on species richness because they do not induce pronounced environmental changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Decocq et al (2005) found it also influential on understory composition; many species need a long time for recolonization after harvesting, species diversity decreases by the ageing of a forest, but the ratio of real forest species -geophytes, shade-tolerant and moisture-demanding species increases. The strong effects of forest management intensity and the time elapsed since the last cutting on understory species composition were shown by Fredericksen et al (1999). Contrarily, according to Graae and Heskjaer (1997), the effect of stand age on understory vegetation is not significant in forests between 50 and 150 years.…”
Section: Herbaceous Speciesmentioning
confidence: 96%