2021
DOI: 10.3390/w13243482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Term River Flood Forecasting Using Composite Models and Automated Machine Learning: The Case Study of Lena River

Abstract: The paper presents a hybrid approach for short-term river flood forecasting. It is based on multi-modal data fusion from different sources (weather stations, water height sensors, remote sensing data). To improve the forecasting efficiency, the machine learning methods and the Snowmelt-Runoff physical model are combined in a composite modeling pipeline using automated machine learning techniques. The novelty of the study is based on the application of automated machine learning to identify the individual block… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible next step in the research is to use artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques. In fact, combining machine learning and physical-based models is becoming popular in the design of predictive systems [29,30]. Including the human component is especially relevant in southern Europe where water retention is a more common practice.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible next step in the research is to use artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques. In fact, combining machine learning and physical-based models is becoming popular in the design of predictive systems [29,30]. Including the human component is especially relevant in southern Europe where water retention is a more common practice.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar problems have been encountered in the prediction of midwinter breakups (the early breakup of ice cover brought about by midwinter thaws) using data‐based thresholds on single location (Carr & Vuyovich, 2014; Prowse et al., 2002) or regional scales (Newton et al., 2017) and machine learning analysis (De Coste et al., 2022a, 2022b), or in the prediction of breakup ice jams using artificial neural networks (Massie et al., 2002), neuro‐fuzzy systems (Mahabir et al., 2006), and stacking ensembles (De Coste et al., 2021). These techniques have also been extended to generalized spring flooding using boosting and random forest (RF; Kulin et al., 2021), ensembles of regression and snowmelt models (Sarafanaov et al., 2021), and recurrent neural networks (Cai & Yu, 2022). The management of data in these hydrological forecasting studies, especially when attempting modeling on regional or national scales, is often a challenge, as is delivering a user‐friendly means of deployment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Castelletti, 2012;Antonio Francipane, 2012;Singh, 2009;Silberstein, 2006). Machine learning approaches can automate data ingestion, (Mikhail Sarafanov, 2021; Randal S. Olson, 2016) but their opacity may limit insight and stakeholder trust (Jajarmizadeh, 2012). Both approaches require large amounts of computational power and data (R. Kumar, 2013;Moges B. Wagena, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%