2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Term Results of the S-ROM-A Femoral Prosthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in the present study, the JOA score at the final follow-up was relatively low (80 points) compared to previous reports [ 2 , 3 ]. The high rate of patients who had postosteotomy hip joint likely affected the functional results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, in the present study, the JOA score at the final follow-up was relatively low (80 points) compared to previous reports [ 2 , 3 ]. The high rate of patients who had postosteotomy hip joint likely affected the functional results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…They reported 0% aseptic loosening in 55 hips with anatomically difficult cases, of which 28 were severe DDH cases. Regarding the use of the S-ROM-A prosthesis, Kido et al [ 2 ] and Tamegai et al [ 3 ] reported that it was well-fitted for Asian DDH patients with short stature, a narrow canal, and severe proximal femoral deformity, showing favorable short- to midterm results. Zhao and Sun [ 4 ] reported good short-term results in elderly patients with poor bone quality containing Dorr type C using the S-ROM system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients in this study should comparable improvement in their hip scores compared to previous reports of patients who underwent complex, primary, cementless, total hip arthroplasty with conical prostheses as well as modular prostheses [1,2,6,8,11,15,19,27,28,30,31]. Despite predictable success with similar stems, it remains critically important to systematically report clinical and radiographic results whenever new technology is introduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The optimal stem design in these patients is unknown. A number of studies have reported that modular prostheses such as the S-ROM (DePuy, Inc) can help deal with these anatomical challenges [2,5,6,11,19,30]; however, a theoretical disadvantage includes the potential for metal corrosion with modularity [9,20]. The Wagner Cone stem can accommodate small or deformed femora because of its proximal conical, tapered design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achieving optimal component placement with accurate preoperative surgical planning could benefit the long-term survivorship as well as a better range of motion and functional recovery. Of course, surgeons can adjust the stem anteversion during THA by using undersized stem during THA [22]. However, this is not only difficult in the proximal femur with narrow mediolateral dimension [14] or metaphyseal filling stems following proximal femoral geometry [16], but also not recommendable for optimal initial stem stability and longevity of the stem as well [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%