2022
DOI: 10.7554/elife.74565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term plasticity in the human visual thalamus

Abstract: While there is evidence that the visual cortex retains a potential for plasticity in adulthood, less is known about the subcortical stages of visual processing. Here we asked whether short-term ocular dominance plasticity affects the human visual thalamus. We addressed this question in normally sighted adult humans, using ultra-high field (7T) magnetic resonance imaging combined with the paradigm of short-term monocular deprivation. With this approach, we previously demonstrated transient shifts of perceptual … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, changes of eye-specific responses in the LGN has only been demonstrated in rodents that have been monocularly deprived for a week (Jaepel et al, 2017). A recent functional brain imaging (fMRI) study involving visually healthy human adults did not observe changes in LGN after 2-hours of monocular deprivation (Kurzawski et al, 2022). It is worth noting, however that the neural mechanisms underlying this kind of short-term plasticity may be different from those induced by a more extended period of monocular deprivation (Ramamurthy and Blaser, 2021) or binocular perceptual training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To our knowledge, changes of eye-specific responses in the LGN has only been demonstrated in rodents that have been monocularly deprived for a week (Jaepel et al, 2017). A recent functional brain imaging (fMRI) study involving visually healthy human adults did not observe changes in LGN after 2-hours of monocular deprivation (Kurzawski et al, 2022). It is worth noting, however that the neural mechanisms underlying this kind of short-term plasticity may be different from those induced by a more extended period of monocular deprivation (Ramamurthy and Blaser, 2021) or binocular perceptual training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…One failed in binocular fusion in the EEG pre-test, thus also quit from the rest of the experiment. The sample size was predetermined based on previous studies in this field ( Lunghi et al, 2015 ; Binda et al, 2018 ; Lyu et al, 2020 ; Virathone et al, 2021 ; Baldwin et al, 2022 ; Kurzawski et al, 2022 ). All participants were naive to the experimental hypotheses, had normal or corrected-to-normal vision.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This counterintuitive result, consistent with homeostatic plasticity, is interpreted as a compensatory adjustment of contrast gain in response to deprivation. The deprived eye boost is observed also at the neural level, as revealed by EEG 28 , MEG 29 and fMRI 30,31 and, importantly, it is mediated by a decrease of GABAergic inhibition in the primary visual cortex 32 . The effect of short-term MD decays within 90 minutes from eye-patch removal 25,27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The artifact-free EEG segments analysed for estimating power band content in five frequency bands of interest were considered: theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8)(9)(10)(11)(12), low beta (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), high beta (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) and gamma (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45). Power densities were estimated by applying a Hamming-windowed FFT on 4 sec consecutive EEG segments and log-transformed (dB).…”
Section: Monocular Deprivation Morning Eeg Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%