2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2022.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short term outcomes with dual chamber versus single chamber pacing for atrioventricular block - A crossover trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 8 ] However, multiple large, randomized, trials have failed to demonstrate reduction of mortality in patients with dual-chamber pacing compared to ventricular pacing. [ 9 10 11 12 13 14 ] Moreover, results on its effects on quality of life or morbidity are also inconclusive. [ 1 6 ] Based on a Cochrane review, DDD is the preferred method of pacing as there was lower incidence of AF and lower prevalence of pacemaker syndrome when compared to ventricular pacemakers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 8 ] However, multiple large, randomized, trials have failed to demonstrate reduction of mortality in patients with dual-chamber pacing compared to ventricular pacing. [ 9 10 11 12 13 14 ] Moreover, results on its effects on quality of life or morbidity are also inconclusive. [ 1 6 ] Based on a Cochrane review, DDD is the preferred method of pacing as there was lower incidence of AF and lower prevalence of pacemaker syndrome when compared to ventricular pacemakers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of studies examining the relationship between the number of pacemaker leads and the development of complications are not consistent in the literature. There are also studies that emphasize the importance of operator experience rather than the number of leads [23,24] . Aggarwal et al [25] reported that single or double lead implantation did not affect the rates of pneumothorax and general complication development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%