2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12928-018-0547-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term outcome and mid-term access site complications of the percutaneous approach to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (PEVAR) after introduction in a vascular teaching hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Femoral access was performed mostly under spinal anesthesia (87.5%) with a surgical cut-down of the common femoral artery (84.4%) but in two cases the access was achieved one side surgically and one side percutaneously. In four selected patients (12.5%) the procedure was performed under local anesthesia with a bilateral percutaneous access with previous insertion of two Proglide for each side according to the Perclose technique [13]. Three E-ventus bridging stents (9.4%) were introduced via an axillary access performed under local anesthesia due to the presence of a bifurcated aortic graft already implanted or the impossibility to release from the contralateral due to short target common iliac artery.…”
Section: Baseline Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femoral access was performed mostly under spinal anesthesia (87.5%) with a surgical cut-down of the common femoral artery (84.4%) but in two cases the access was achieved one side surgically and one side percutaneously. In four selected patients (12.5%) the procedure was performed under local anesthesia with a bilateral percutaneous access with previous insertion of two Proglide for each side according to the Perclose technique [13]. Three E-ventus bridging stents (9.4%) were introduced via an axillary access performed under local anesthesia due to the presence of a bifurcated aortic graft already implanted or the impossibility to release from the contralateral due to short target common iliac artery.…”
Section: Baseline Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The femoral artery has been widely utilized and remained as the primary percutaneous arterial access site for non-cardiac percutaneous based procedures. The reported incidence of femoral artery pseudoaneurysms varies significantly in the literature [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Some guidelines by certain society such as Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology suggest an acceptable rate of less than 0.2% [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported incidence of femoral artery pseudoaneurysms varies signi cantly in the literature. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Some , guidelines by certain society such as Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology suggest an acceptable rate of less than 0.2%. [5] In a study of using color ow duplex sonography to examine the puncture site in 565 consecutive patients who had undergone transfemoral arterial catheterization with angiography, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, or local lysis, the overall incidence of pseudoaneurysm was found to be 7.7%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%