Volume 2A: 44th Design Automation Conference 2018
DOI: 10.1115/detc2018-86084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Term Load Forecasting With Different Aggregation Strategies

Abstract: Effective short-term load forecasting (STLF) plays an important role in demand-side management and power system operations. In this paper, STLF with three aggregation strategies are developed, which are information aggregation (IA), model aggregation (MA), and hierarchy aggregation (HA). The IA, MA, and HA strategies aggregate inputs, models, and forecasts, respectively, at different stages in the forecasting process. To verify the effectiveness of the three aggregation STLF, a set of 10 models based on 4 mach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it can be concluded that both UC and M3 have improved the short-term GHI forecasting accuracy significantly. 3) Calendar and weather effects: It is reported in the literature that the forecasting accuracy of power time series, such as solar and load, is influenced by calendar effects [37] and weather effects [8]. To further explore the calendar and weather effects on the developed method, the best model(s) in each group is(are) picked out to make comparisons, which are C opt , SVR 3 , and GBM 3 in the UC-M3 group ({C opt,cm , SVR 3,cm , GBM 3,cm }∈M l,cm ), C opt and SVR 2 in the UC-SAML group ({C opt,cs , SVR 2,cs }∈M l,cs ), SVR 2 in the AIO-M3 group (SVR 2,am ∈M l,am ), and 1HA persistence of cloudiness method in the AIO-SAML group (P as ∈M l,as ).…”
Section: Forecasting Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it can be concluded that both UC and M3 have improved the short-term GHI forecasting accuracy significantly. 3) Calendar and weather effects: It is reported in the literature that the forecasting accuracy of power time series, such as solar and load, is influenced by calendar effects [37] and weather effects [8]. To further explore the calendar and weather effects on the developed method, the best model(s) in each group is(are) picked out to make comparisons, which are C opt , SVR 3 , and GBM 3 in the UC-M3 group ({C opt,cm , SVR 3,cm , GBM 3,cm }∈M l,cm ), C opt and SVR 2 in the UC-SAML group ({C opt,cs , SVR 2,cs }∈M l,cs ), SVR 2 in the AIO-M3 group (SVR 2,am ∈M l,am ), and 1HA persistence of cloudiness method in the AIO-SAML group (P as ∈M l,as ).…”
Section: Forecasting Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Alamaniotis et al [7] linearly combined six Gaussian processes (GPs), which outperformed individual GPs. Feng et al [8] aggregated multiple artificial neural network (ANN), SVR, random forest (RF), and gradient boosting machine (GBM) models to mitigate the risk of choosing unsatisfactory models. Second, load patterns are classified into clusters based on some similarities to select the best load forecasting model in each cluster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%