2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19084670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Term Functional Outcomes of Short Femoral Neck Stems Are the Same as Those of Conventional Stems in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract: (1) Background: In this study, two types of implants were compared—a conventional hip stem and a femoral neck prosthesis. (2) Methods: The femoral neck prosthesis study group included 21 patients, while the conventional hip stem control group was 40 patients. The first examination was the pre-op check, while the next ones were performed 6 weeks, 1 year, and 3 years after surgery. The Harris Hip Score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Universi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distal surface has a macro roughened surface that is obtained by blasting with a controlled flow of corundum particles [ 12 ]. Following the findings that the diaphyseal tract of a traditional femoral component was no longer necessary to implant stability, once proximal fixation was achieved, the MINIMA S femoral stem was created as part of the efforts made to develop short femoral solutions [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distal surface has a macro roughened surface that is obtained by blasting with a controlled flow of corundum particles [ 12 ]. Following the findings that the diaphyseal tract of a traditional femoral component was no longer necessary to implant stability, once proximal fixation was achieved, the MINIMA S femoral stem was created as part of the efforts made to develop short femoral solutions [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%