2021
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20211402.6081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term feeding behaviour sound classification method for sheep using LSTM networks

Abstract: A deep learning approach using long-short term memory (LSTM) networks was implemented in this study to classify the sound of short-term feeding behaviour of sheep, including biting, chewing, bolus regurgitation, and rumination chewing. The original acoustic signal was split into sound episodes using an endpoint detection method, where the thresholds of short-term energy and average zero-crossing rate were utilized. A discrete wavelet transform (DWT), Mel-frequency cepstral, and principal-component analysis (PC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…F1 score considers both the precision and the sensitivity. It is the harmonic mean of the previous two measures: precision and sensitivity ( van der Goot and van Noord, 2017 ; Duan et al, 2021 ). F1 score is defined as…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…F1 score considers both the precision and the sensitivity. It is the harmonic mean of the previous two measures: precision and sensitivity ( van der Goot and van Noord, 2017 ; Duan et al, 2021 ). F1 score is defined as…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F1 score considers both the precision and the sensitivity. It is the harmonic mean of the previous two measures: precision and sensitivity (van der Goot and van Noord, 2017;Duan et al, 2021). F1 score is defined as Two other measures: Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) and Fowlkes-Mallows index (FMI) are defined as:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comprehensive performance of the audio classification model was indicated by the four commonly used evaluation metrics [24,48], i.e. precision, recall, F1 score and accuracy:Precision=true0TPTP+FP ×100%,Recall=true0TPTP+FN ×100%,F1 score=true02TP2TP+FP+FN ×100%normaland2emAccuracy=true0TP+TNTP+TN+FP+FN ×100%,where TP, FP, TN and FN were the number of true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comprehensive performance of the audio classification model was indicated by the four commonly used evaluation metrics [24,48], i.e. precision, recall, F1 score and accuracy:…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comprehensive performance of the audio classification model was indicated by the four commonly used evaluation metrics [24,47], i . e ., precision, recall, F1score, and accuracy: where TP, FP, TN , and FN were the number of true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%