2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35326-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term exposure to wildfire-related PM2.5 increases mortality risks and burdens in Brazil

Abstract: To assess mortality risks and burdens associated with short-term exposure to wildfire-related fine particulate matter with diameter ≤ 2.5 μm (PM2.5), we collect daily mortality data from 2000 to 2016 for 510 immediate regions in Brazil, the most wildfire-prone area. We integrate data from multiple sources with a chemical transport model at the global scale to isolate daily concentrations of wildfire-related PM2.5 at a 0.25 × 0.25 resolution. With a two-stage time-series approach, we estimate (i) an increase of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most previous studies have explored the relationship between wildfire and health outcomes by comparing periods with no fire and periods during or after fire events, or comparing regions affected by wildfire smoke and unaffected regions (22), which generated effect estimates that are difficult to directly compare to our estimates. Only a few studies have isolated wildfire- specific PM 2.5 from other sources, and used a continuous variable for smoke PM 2.5 concentrations instead of a binary variable to estimate the health effects of smoke PM 2.5 (9, 10). Our findings on the associations between smoke PM 2.5 and all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality are consistent with these studies in terms of both magnitude and direction of the estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most previous studies have explored the relationship between wildfire and health outcomes by comparing periods with no fire and periods during or after fire events, or comparing regions affected by wildfire smoke and unaffected regions (22), which generated effect estimates that are difficult to directly compare to our estimates. Only a few studies have isolated wildfire- specific PM 2.5 from other sources, and used a continuous variable for smoke PM 2.5 concentrations instead of a binary variable to estimate the health effects of smoke PM 2.5 (9, 10). Our findings on the associations between smoke PM 2.5 and all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality are consistent with these studies in terms of both magnitude and direction of the estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, studies consistently reported a positive relationship between wildfire smoke exposure and all-cause mortality (7, 9, 10). Among specific causes of mortality, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases received most attention, with growing studies linking human exposure to wildfire smoke with increased risks of respiratory and cardiovascular mortality (9-11). However, in addition to the physical health harms, mental health can also be potentially threatened by wildfire smoke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…69 Despite strong established links between all-source PM and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular health, evidence related to wildfire smoke exposure has been mixed. 70 Some studies have reported positive associations between wildfire pollution and cardiovascular mortality 71 and morbidity, 67,72,73 including out of hospital heart attacks, 74,75 especially among older adults. 76 However, a number of studies have also reported non-meaningful association, non-statistically-significant differences, or even declines in cardiovascularrelated healthcare utilization (e.g., 54,[77][78][79][80] ).…”
Section: Summary Of Health Impacts Of Wildfire Smoke Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…for the temperature in the crossbasis function, df2= 2 for relative humidity, and df3= 7*number of years for the time trend to model for the season and long-term time trends. These parameters were identified based on previous studies[63][18][11][47][62] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%