1980
DOI: 10.1080/00036848000000009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term employment functions and the quasi-fixity of labour: A note

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48 This development has precluded many suits by consumers, including those filed as class actions. 49…”
Section: Cost-plus Contractsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 This development has precluded many suits by consumers, including those filed as class actions. 49…”
Section: Cost-plus Contractsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical evidence indicates that fixed employment costs are higher in the primary sector. 4 Looking at job characteristics, the degree of fixity is higher for male, non-manual and non-production workers (Morgan, 1980;Smyth, 1985). From the industry point of view, fixed costs constitute a relevant proportion of total labour costs but present wide inter-and within-industry differentials.…”
Section: Fixed Employment Costs and Dual Labour Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these have been undertaken for developed countries e.g., [8,30,32] . The way [2,3,[12][13][14]17,26,28] provide no support or only weak support for a negative value of the elasticity of employment demand with respect to wage rate in industries. Some others undertaken in the context of developing countries e.g., [1,9,21,25] but in general, not found empirical support for a negative value of the elasticity of employment demand with respect to wage rate in manufacturing industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the short-run influence of expenditure upon production, employment, hours worked, labor productivity and unemployment have received comparatively little attention. The implications of Oi's hypothesis is examined by [26] with the use of a short-term employment function. The restriction of the employment demand to follow either Cobb-Douglas or the generalized Leontief form gives insignificant wage elasticity but significant employment demand elasticity studied by [17] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%