2018 15th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technolo 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ecticon.2018.8619930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term Electricity Load Forecasting for Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Result Reference MLR with AR(2) Bayesian estimation provides consistent and better accuracy compared to OLS estimation [32] PSO with ANN Implementing PSO on ANN model outperformed shallow ANN model [46] OLS Interation of variable improves the prediction accuracy [31] OLS and Bayesian estimation Including temperature variable in a model can improved the prediction accuracy upto 20% [45] PSO & GA with ANN PSO+GA outperformed PSO with ANN [35] OLS, GLSAR, FF-ANN OLS and GLSAR models showed better forecasting accuracy than FF-ANN [36] Ensemble for regression and ML Lowers the test MAPE implementing blocked Cross Validation scheme. [37] FNN, RNN based LSTM & GRU For weekdays and for aggregate data GRU shows better accuracy In this study Weather conditions have a significant impact on short-term electricity demand forecasting and are commonly incorporated into forecasting models [43].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Result Reference MLR with AR(2) Bayesian estimation provides consistent and better accuracy compared to OLS estimation [32] PSO with ANN Implementing PSO on ANN model outperformed shallow ANN model [46] OLS Interation of variable improves the prediction accuracy [31] OLS and Bayesian estimation Including temperature variable in a model can improved the prediction accuracy upto 20% [45] PSO & GA with ANN PSO+GA outperformed PSO with ANN [35] OLS, GLSAR, FF-ANN OLS and GLSAR models showed better forecasting accuracy than FF-ANN [36] Ensemble for regression and ML Lowers the test MAPE implementing blocked Cross Validation scheme. [37] FNN, RNN based LSTM & GRU For weekdays and for aggregate data GRU shows better accuracy In this study Weather conditions have a significant impact on short-term electricity demand forecasting and are commonly incorporated into forecasting models [43].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• increasing the number of hidden layers does not ensure the improvement of forecasting accuracy. • as this dataset has been tested in various methods such as Bayesian [32], Regression [32,36,45], machine learning [33][34][35]48], ensemble learning [37] etc, the experimental gap on deep learning network is now fulfilled by this paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian estimation provides consistent and better accuracy compared to OLS estimation 1% to 5% [28] PSO with ANN Implementing PSO on ANN model outperformed shallow ANN model 3.44% [43] OLS Interation of variable improves the prediction accuracy >4% [44] OLS and Bayesian estimation Including temperature variable in a model can improved the prediction accuracy up to 20% 2% to 3% [29] PSO & GA with ANN PSO+GA outperformed PSO with ANN >3% [32] OLS, GLSAR, FNN OLS and GLSAR models showed better forecasting accuracy than FNN 1.74% to 2.95% [22] Ensemble for regression and ML Lowers the test MAPE implementing blocked Cross Validation scheme.…”
Section: Mlr With Ar(2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset we used has been tested in various contexts, such as Bayesian [28], regression [22,28,29], machine learning [30][31][32][33], and ensemble learning [27]; in this paper, we apply it in the context of deep learning networks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since short-term power loads are commonly used in daily or weekly scheduling plans, which have a guiding effect on the grid scheduling department, most domestic and international researchers are committed to improving the accuracy of shortterm power load forecasting. Traditional load forecasting methods include exponential smoothing, autoregressive integral sliding average model, multiple linear regression, and Weighted Moving Average (Chapagain and Kittipiyakul, 2018;Lee et al, 2018;Rosnalini et al, 2019;Nuo et al, 2023). Although these methods have good interpretability and fast computational speed, these methods are less robust and perform poorly in predicting large amounts of data and sudden power loads (Nuo et al, 2023).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%