Short-term effect of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccination on the milk yield in the Deoni and crossbred cows

Krishnaswamy, Narayanan; Jeyakumar, Sakthivel; Selvan, R.P. Tamil; Gowane, G. R.; Mahadappa, Priyanka; Vijayapillai, Umapathi; Dechamma, H J; Patel, B. H. M.; Saravanan, Ponnusamy; Ramesha, K. P.; Sanyal, Aniket

doi:10.1007/s11250-021-02653-y

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although some research found no negative vaccination effects on milk production, other studies have found transient fever and post-vaccinal milk decline in dairy cattle (Musser and Anderson, 1996). Speciesand breed-wise reduction in milk associated with vaccination has been studied, especially in cattle (Bergeron et al, 2008;Schulze et al, 2016;Abutarbush et al, 2016;Morgemstem et al, 2020); Holstein Friesian cattle (Scott et al, 2001); Deoni and Crossbred cattle (Krishnaswamy et al, 2021); sheep; and goat (Giovannini et al, 2004). Several studies re ect a decrease in milk yield after vaccination.The possible reason for the post-vaccinal milk drop is due to a transient fever that reduces milk production in some cows.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The primary issues that dairy farmers endure when practicing vaccination for dairy animals in the eld are a lack of knowledge of the bene ts, reduced milk production, infertility, swelling at the site, fever, vaccination failure, a lack of veterinarians or skilled staff, and a lack of infrastructure to store vaccines. Several studies have reported a marked decline in milk production (Giovannini et al, 2004 (Martinod, 1996;Gethmann et al, 2009), and compromised reproduction (Hansen et al, 2004) for a temporary period after vaccination among the lactating cows that are vaccinated (Bergeron et al, 2008;Morgemstem et al, 2020), but references are lacking in the Indian context (Krishnaswamy et al, 2021). Other after-effects of vaccination, such as 56-day return-to-service patterns (Santman-Berends et al, 2010), pregnancy loss (Baljer and Mayr, 1971), and abortions (Lorenz and Straub, 1973), were also reported.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Individual Variation of Transient Milk Production Loss After Vaccination in Sahiwal Cows (Bos Indicus)

Rajput

Bhakat

Mohanty

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The vaccination of productive animals has been identified as a critical intervention area. The extent of milk production loss following foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), hemorrhagic septicemia and black quarter (HS + BQ), Theileriosis, and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) vaccination needs analysis. So, the present study collected milk production data during different vaccination. A significant (p < 0.01; p < 0.05) decrease in fortnightly total milk yield/animal and average milk yield/animal/day in different parities and stages of lactation after vaccination as compared to pre-vaccination. Among the vaccinated animals, 67.5 to 85.3 percentage animals showed a decline, whereas 14.7 to 32.5 percentage animals indicated no influence on milk production after vaccination. In the case of affected cows, 33–38% of animals showed a decline up to 10%; 20–25% of animals showed a 10–20% decline; 15–24% of animals showed a 20–30% decline; 9–10% of animals showed a 30–40% decline, and 9–15% of animals showed more than 40% decline in average daily milk yield/animal/day after FMD, HS + BQ, Theileriosis, and IBR vaccination. It can conclude that the Bos indicus showed various percentages of milk production declines, and some animals showed no decrease after vaccination.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Individual Variation of Transient Milk Production Loss After Vaccination in Sahiwal Cows (Bos Indicus)

Rajput

Bhakat

Mohanty

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The infection triggers a rapid immune response, although protection to one FMDV isolation may not consistently protect against others according to antigenic variation. Antigenic variation complicates FMDV control and has the prospective to complicate vaccinology and diagnostics [2,3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Foot and mouth disease virus: A review

Jumaa¹,

Mohsin²,

Abdulmjeed³

et al. 2021

Magna Sci. Adv. Biol. Pharm.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As seen by prior tragic outbreaks in many places throughout the world, the foot and mouth disease virus, or "FMDV," is one of the most critical challenges in animal health. In this review, the major features of FMDV, as well as aspects of its interactions with cells and hosts, were discussed. On the other hand, present and upcoming FMD treatment approaches. The first vertebrate virus found was the foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). A capsid protein and the viral genome (+ve sense single strand RNA) make up FMDV. The icosahedral symmetry of the viral structure is made up of structural proteins (VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP4) as well as non-structural proteins (L, 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, 3C, and 3D). The viral replication takes place in the cytoplasm of the cell. Because FMDV has a short incubation period, it spreads quickly. Direct contact is the most often used method of FMDV transmission. The occurrence of direct contact via aerosol and mechanical transmission (fomites, feed, and water). The immunological response is stimulated by the infection with FMD. However, due to virus antigenic diversity, the immune response does not always protect against FMD (antigenic shift). FMDV is divided into seven serotypes based on antigenic variation. O, A, C, SAT-1, SAT-2, SAT-3, and Asia-1 are the serotypes in question. O is the most frequent serotype.

show abstract

Effect of foot-and-mouth disease vaccination on acute phase response and milk production in the Holstein-Friesian crossbred cow

Raina

Patel

Somagond

et al. 2023

Journal of Applied Animal Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Short-term effect of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccination on the milk yield in the Deoni and crossbred cows

Cited by 3 publications

References 8 publications

Individual Variation of Transient Milk Production Loss After Vaccination in Sahiwal Cows (Bos Indicus)

Individual Variation of Transient Milk Production Loss After Vaccination in Sahiwal Cows (Bos Indicus)

Foot and mouth disease virus: A review

Effect of foot-and-mouth disease vaccination on acute phase response and milk production in the Holstein-Friesian crossbred cow

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About