2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1042-444x(03)00017-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term contrarian investing—is it profitable? … Yes and No

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
31
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
11
31
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is evidenced by the significant return reversals especially in the third and fourth weeks following the news. The results are in line with the findings of Ali et al (2011), Iehara et al (2004 and Lee et al (2003). The loser stocks of same category yield positive returns while the winner stocks exhibit negative but insignificant returns highlighting reversals.…”
Section: Conclusion and Practical Implications 51 Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is evidenced by the significant return reversals especially in the third and fourth weeks following the news. The results are in line with the findings of Ali et al (2011), Iehara et al (2004 and Lee et al (2003). The loser stocks of same category yield positive returns while the winner stocks exhibit negative but insignificant returns highlighting reversals.…”
Section: Conclusion and Practical Implications 51 Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Conrad (1994) later found that stronger reversals were observed in case of low volume stocks as compared to high volume stocks. Similar results are revealed for the Australian market by Lee et al (2003), emphasizing that the high volume stocks have significantly lower returns as compared to the low volume stocks. Iihara et al (2004) evidenced in their study that the return reversals are more pronounced in case of loser stocks as compared to winner stocks.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…3 Most studies find that technical analysis is not profitable once transaction costs are taken into account (e.g., Allen and Karjalainen, 1999;Bessembinder and Chan, 1998;Olson, 2004). However, Corrado and Lee (1992) and Lee, Chan, Faff, and Kalev (2003) point out that technical analysis may still have merit as a value-adding "overlay" strategy to assist investors such as fund managers in better timing the buying or selling of stocks as part of their normal trading activities. Under this scenario the stock trades would have occurred in the normal course of business so the transaction costs are already factored in.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the presence of statistical arbitrage can reduce these autocorrelations, but these possibilities are limited by various transaction costs, so anticorrelations at daily frequencies often remain noticeable [see Jegadeesh and Titman, 1995]. In more recent studies, anticorrelations in returns are evidenced for many "other than US" markets [see Lee et al, 2003]. Our findings add one more possible explanation.…”
Section: Documents De Travail Du Centre D'economie De La Sorbonne -20mentioning
confidence: 68%