2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term complications in hip fracture surgery using spinal versus general anaesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
68
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This study has several strengths in comparison to previous observational studies : it was conducted prospectively; it captured data about large numbers of patients (~ one‐fifth of all hip fractures in England, Wales and Northern Ireland annually); and data‐point completion rates were high (> 90% for most fields). Importantly, data about anaesthesia were collected by anaesthetists and so are likely to provide a far more accurate indication of actual interventions than retrospective data about anaesthesia collected by non‐anaesthetists .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has several strengths in comparison to previous observational studies : it was conducted prospectively; it captured data about large numbers of patients (~ one‐fifth of all hip fractures in England, Wales and Northern Ireland annually); and data‐point completion rates were high (> 90% for most fields). Importantly, data about anaesthesia were collected by anaesthetists and so are likely to provide a far more accurate indication of actual interventions than retrospective data about anaesthesia collected by non‐anaesthetists .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the number of patients that underwent general anesthesia was high (65%). Whether general or spinal anesthesia leads to fewer complications in hip fracture patients is still a matter of debate [2427]. The recent Cochrane review did not find a difference in either technique and asked for more research [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Sjúklingar sem gangast undir aðgerð vegna mjaðm-arbrots fá annaðhvort maenudeyfingu eða eru svaefðir. Í nýlegum rannsóknum hefur ekki fundist munur á dánartíðni milli maenudeyfingar og svaefingar 18,19 en aðgerðar-og legutími er styttri ef maenudeyfing er notuð. 18 Einnig hefur verið sýnt fram á minni líkur á blóðsegamyndun í djúpum bláaeðum og faerri blóðgjafir við maenudeyfingu.…”
Section: áGripunclassified
“…18 Einnig hefur verið sýnt fram á minni líkur á blóðsegamyndun í djúpum bláaeðum og faerri blóðgjafir við maenudeyfingu. 19 Meðallegutími eftir mjaðmarbrot er misjafn eftir löndum en hann er á bilinu 9-12 dagar í Bretlandi og Danmörku 5,20 en einungis 5-6 dagar í Bandaríkjunum. 21 Skipulag heilbrigðiskerfis hefur að sjálfsögðu mikil áhrif á þennan þátt, til daemis aðgengi að heimahjúkrun, sjúkra-hótelum, hjúkrunarheimilum og endurhaefingu eftir aðgerð.…”
Section: áGripunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation