2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11676-021-01431-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term changes in soil properties after prescribed fire and mulching with fern in Mediterranean forests

Abstract: the prescribed fire and mulching were dependent on the time elapsed from their application and forest species. In general, mulching was not effective in limiting the changes in the monitored soil properties compared to the pre-fire values. Each forest species showed different temporal trends in changes of soil properties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(139 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some research supports this explanation, since increases in the organic carbon content in burned areas compared to the unburned sites have been recorded also for low-to moderate-intensity fires, such as the prescribed fires [87]. Another possible reason for the OM increase of our experiment may be the addition of partially pyrolyzed plant residues [82,88], the incorporation of ash into the soil [81], and the forest floor decomposition [89]. Overall, the OM content is one of the most important quality indicators among the physico-chemical properties of soil, considering its influence on plant growth and other soil processes, such as water retention, nutrient exchange, and soil structure [50,79].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some research supports this explanation, since increases in the organic carbon content in burned areas compared to the unburned sites have been recorded also for low-to moderate-intensity fires, such as the prescribed fires [87]. Another possible reason for the OM increase of our experiment may be the addition of partially pyrolyzed plant residues [82,88], the incorporation of ash into the soil [81], and the forest floor decomposition [89]. Overall, the OM content is one of the most important quality indicators among the physico-chemical properties of soil, considering its influence on plant growth and other soil processes, such as water retention, nutrient exchange, and soil structure [50,79].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In a study by [44] that was carried out in a burned pine stand of Central Eastern Spain, the soil pH was slightly affected by fire and post-fire logging. In burned forests of Southern Italy, [81] found significant reductions in pH of soils that were treated with fern mulching immediately after the fire, but the pH values were not restored after one year compared to the unburned areas. The authors concluded that mulching was not successful to limit the changes in these soil properties, although it should bear in mind the low severity of the fire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main chemical properties of the soil samples (pH, electrical conductivity, contents of organic carbon, total nitrogen, potassium, magnesium, calcium, and phosphates) were analyzed in laboratory (Table A1). The analytical methods are described in [52].…”
Section: Chemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, forest fires result in ash deposition, changes in the structure, concentrations and forms of soil elements or compounds (Badía et al, 2017;Zavala et al, 2014) as well as in alterations of its biological properties (Agbeshie et al, 2022;Pellegrini et al, 2018). For instance, organic matter and nutrient contents decrease after fire, and changes in microbial communities composition and enzymatic activity are common (Carra et al, 2021;Inbar et al, 2014;Lucas-Borja et al, 2020c). The forest type (natural or reforested stand), age (young or old stands) and management practices (that is, forest operations) can play an important role in driving the soil properties after fire (Jarvis et al, 2013;Neary et al, 1999;Zema, 2021;Zema et al, 2021bZema et al, , 2021a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%