2000
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.15.1217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Term Breast Cancer Prediction by Random Periareolar Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and the Gail Risk Model

Abstract: : Cytomorphology from breast random periareolar fine-needle aspirates can be used with the Gail risk model to identify a cohort of women at very high short-term risk for developing breast cancer. We recommend that cytomorphology be studied for use as a potential surrogate end point in prevention trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
253
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
8
253
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 In the few studies that have examined the breast cancer risk associated with cytologic atypia, a finding of cytologic atypia was associated with a breast cancer risk similar to that reported in women with a finding of atypical hyperplasia on examination of histologic sections. 2,3 Although the cytologic criteria used to categorize intraductal epithelial changes are well defined, they have not been uniformly applied, and they have not been proven to be reproducible. 4,5 In studies that have compared cytologic findings of atypia with histologic findings from corresponding tissue, the correlation was poor and the rate of false-positive results high.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,2 In the few studies that have examined the breast cancer risk associated with cytologic atypia, a finding of cytologic atypia was associated with a breast cancer risk similar to that reported in women with a finding of atypical hyperplasia on examination of histologic sections. 2,3 Although the cytologic criteria used to categorize intraductal epithelial changes are well defined, they have not been uniformly applied, and they have not been proven to be reproducible. 4,5 In studies that have compared cytologic findings of atypia with histologic findings from corresponding tissue, the correlation was poor and the rate of false-positive results high.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In all women, random periareolar FNA was performed four times each at the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock positions in each breast as previously described. 2 Briefly, a 1.5-inch, 23-gauge needle attached to a 10-ml syringe was used. The needle was inserted approximately 1-2 cm away from the areola, at 3 o'clock and later at 9 o'clock.…”
Section: Fine-needle Aspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29). We have previously reported that, independent of the Gail risk model (30), women whose RPFNA specimens exhibit hyperplasia with atypia were five times more likely to develop ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive breast cancer within 4 years, compared with women without evidence of atypia (29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously reported that, independent of the Gail risk model (30), women whose RPFNA specimens exhibit hyperplasia with atypia were five times more likely to develop ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive breast cancer within 4 years, compared with women without evidence of atypia (29). RPFNA atypia fulfills the criteria of a good risk biomarker for breast cancer, in that it is biologically related, statistically associated, obtained easily, and, most importantly, reversible (29,31). We hypothesized that women with lower intakes and levels of omega-3 relative to omega-6 fatty acids in their blood and breast tissue would be more likely to exhibit RPFNA atypia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two prospective studies with long-term follow-up have shown independently that women with cellular atypia detected in breast ductal cytology have an approximately five-fold increased relative risk of developing breast carcinoma. 27,28 The clinical significance of identifying atypia in an increased-risk cohort is unclear but may translate into a decrease in breast carcinoma incidence if appropriate interventions are developed and implemented in the future.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%