2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term biodistribution and clearance of intravenously administered silica nanoparticles

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(76 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies also reported liver and spleen as target organs both after single and repeated intravenous exposure to SNPs. [41] Our results are consistent with other reports that showed smaller (13nm) mesoporous silica nanoparticles were conspicuously retained in the liver of male rats for up to 60 days. [42] Kumar et al also showed more accumulation of modified MSNPs (ORMOSIL)(20-25nm) in spleen, liver, and stomach than in kidney, heart, and lungs after intravenous injection.…”
Section: Histologysupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies also reported liver and spleen as target organs both after single and repeated intravenous exposure to SNPs. [41] Our results are consistent with other reports that showed smaller (13nm) mesoporous silica nanoparticles were conspicuously retained in the liver of male rats for up to 60 days. [42] Kumar et al also showed more accumulation of modified MSNPs (ORMOSIL)(20-25nm) in spleen, liver, and stomach than in kidney, heart, and lungs after intravenous injection.…”
Section: Histologysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This could be due to the longer process of clearance of the larger Stöber SNPs from the liver due to reduced surface area. [41] Since most of the SNPs accumulated in liver and spleen, it is possible that the nanoparticles are either taken up by phagocytic cells in the blood or accumulated in liver and spleen resident macrophages for further clearance. This long-term silica nanoparticle stability in macrophages was reported before.…”
Section: Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggregates of macrophages or microgranulomes increased between 6 and 24 h after silica nanoparticle administration. Clearance of silica nanoparticles from the liver appears to be slower than from the spleen, probably due to hepatic processing and biliary excretion (98).…”
Section: As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different pharmacokinetic models such as compartmental and especially physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have been developed to characterize the disposition of drugs in different organs and tissues, and especially in the liver, when they are administered in different types of nanoparticles (98,(106)(107)(108)(109)(110)(111)(112).…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excretion of NMs is the final step of their metabolic kinetics in vivo, which is closely related with their distribution. For instance, intravenously and subcutaneously injected SiNPs accumulate in the liver and are primarily eliminated through hepatic processing and excreted via the biliary or feces route [89,90]. Interestingly, Qi et al [91] found that a majority of GO nanoplatelets (GONPs) and oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (oMWCNTs) were excreted through feces after respective intravenous administration, while coexposure to both NMs led to urine excretion.…”
Section: Distribution and Metabolism Of Nms In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%