2014
DOI: 10.1097/mbp.0000000000000062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term beat-to-beat but not ambulatory blood pressure variability is correlated to carotid intima-media thickness

Abstract: Short-term beat-to-beat TR of BP variation is associated independently with CCA-IMT values and presents a better predictor of target organ damage involvement than BP variability indexes derived from ABPM.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[30,31] A recent study reported that time rate of BP variation but not ambulatory BPV was correlated with carotid IMT. [32] These controversial results may have arisen from differences in patient population selection, BPV index, sample size, study endpoints, and other factors. In our previous study, [20] we found that, for the nondiabetes patients, SBP fluctuations during daytime and during a 24 hours period were significantly associated with increased CCA-IMT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30,31] A recent study reported that time rate of BP variation but not ambulatory BPV was correlated with carotid IMT. [32] These controversial results may have arisen from differences in patient population selection, BPV index, sample size, study endpoints, and other factors. In our previous study, [20] we found that, for the nondiabetes patients, SBP fluctuations during daytime and during a 24 hours period were significantly associated with increased CCA-IMT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Manios et al [31] corroborate the hypothesis that increased BP variability influences CIMT progression. Eighty-five patients were recruited (40 without hypertension and 45 with hypertension) with a mean age of 54.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Table 2 summarizes the characteristics of selected studies. Two of the 19 studies are longitudinal studies [ 40 , 42 ], 11 are case–control studies [ 20 , 35 , 37 , 39 , 43 , 44 , 46 48 , 50 , 51 ], while the remaining are cohort studies which only involve the hypertension group [ 34 , 36 , 38 , 41 , 45 , 49 ]. 15 studies involved participants with a mean age ranging from 40 to 65 years [ 20 , 34 37 , 39 44 , 46 , 48 50 ], while three studies recruited older individuals aged above 65 years [ 45 , 47 , 51 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%