2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2398305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of IFRS Adoption on Disclosure Quality and Earnings Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(188 reference statements)
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as explained above, Christensen et al (2015) reached a different conclusion as they provided evidence that accounting quality has improved following the voluntary IFRS adoption in Germany, and they refer to the incentives behind the adoption of these firms. These contradicting results are explained with regards to German GAAP and IFRS differences, as well as voluntary verses mandatory adoption by Salewski's et al (2014) study. They compare earnings management under German GAAP in comparison to IFRS across two periods under IFRS adoption in the MENA region IFRS adoption, with each period covering four years.…”
Section: Reflection and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, as explained above, Christensen et al (2015) reached a different conclusion as they provided evidence that accounting quality has improved following the voluntary IFRS adoption in Germany, and they refer to the incentives behind the adoption of these firms. These contradicting results are explained with regards to German GAAP and IFRS differences, as well as voluntary verses mandatory adoption by Salewski's et al (2014) study. They compare earnings management under German GAAP in comparison to IFRS across two periods under IFRS adoption in the MENA region IFRS adoption, with each period covering four years.…”
Section: Reflection and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Literature review and research hypotheses Previous researchers have studied financial reporting quality from different perspectives to evaluate accounting quality. There are different indicators that reflect the quality of accounting, such as earnings management or income smoothing (Healy and Wahlen, 1999;Holland and Ramsay, 2003;Ding et al, 2007;Aussenegg et al, 2008;Cai et al, 2008;Jeanjean and Stolowy, 2008;Chen et al, 2010;Garcia and Pope, 2011;Ahmed et al, 2013;Shubita, 2015), financial analysts' forecasts (Byard et al, 2011;Jansson et al, 2012), loss provisions (Leventis et al, 2011), discretionary accruals (Callao and Jarne, 2010;Shubita, 2010;Houqe et al, 2012;Salewski et al, 2014) and timely loss recognition (Gebhardt and Novotny-Farkas, 2011;Ahmed et al, 2013). Studies refer explicitly to financial reporting quality by concentrating on a selective group of financial reporting issues that have impacted on the measurement of net income and assets that are subject to impairment (Singleton-Green, 2015).…”
Section: Ifrs Adoption In the Mena Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A convergência aos padrões internacionais determinou exigências específicas de divulgação, com foco na característica qualitativa da relevância da informação contábil. Alguns estudos têm considerado a relevância da adoção das normas internacionais no disclosure de informações contábeis (OLIVEIRA; LEMES, 2011; MA-CEDO; ARAÚJO; BRAGA, 2012; AGYEI-MENSAH, SANTOS;MAPURUNGA, 2013;SALEWSKI, 2014), já que a evidenciação de informações mais claras e compreensíveis ajuda a reduzir a assimetria de informações e pode representar um indicador de eficiência.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified