2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2013.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short sleep duration predicts risk of metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
148
2
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
148
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our metaanalysis takes the evidence further by including 18 studies and analyzing the association of different categories of short sleep (,5, 5-6, and 6-7 h) duration as well as long sleep (8-9 and .9 h) with MetS. In fact, results of our metaregression sensitivity analysis show that exclusion of the data for greater than 9 hours of sleep duration from the rest of the different durations of sleep (,5, 5-6, 6-7, 8-9), predicts a dose-dependent response, a finding not shown in prior metaanalyses (19,20,46). In other words, every 1 hour decrease in sleep duration corresponds to a 0.06 increase in the OR of having MetS.…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 42%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our metaanalysis takes the evidence further by including 18 studies and analyzing the association of different categories of short sleep (,5, 5-6, and 6-7 h) duration as well as long sleep (8-9 and .9 h) with MetS. In fact, results of our metaregression sensitivity analysis show that exclusion of the data for greater than 9 hours of sleep duration from the rest of the different durations of sleep (,5, 5-6, 6-7, 8-9), predicts a dose-dependent response, a finding not shown in prior metaanalyses (19,20,46). In other words, every 1 hour decrease in sleep duration corresponds to a 0.06 increase in the OR of having MetS.…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Our metaanalysis expands on the findings of the metaanalysis by Xi and colleagues (20), in which 10 studies were analyzed comparing essentially two categories of sleep duration: less than or equal to 6 hours of sleep with greater than or equal to 8 hours of sleep-the former found more strongly associated with MetS than the latter. However, because most studies in the metaanalysis by Xi and colleagues (20) were done in Asia, the results cannot be considered generalizable. Our metaanalysis takes the evidence further by including 18 studies and analyzing the association of different categories of short sleep (,5, 5-6, and 6-7 h) duration as well as long sleep (8-9 and .9 h) with MetS.…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the conducted tests show no dependency between short sleep duration (≤ 6 h) and the risk of MetS, despite the fact that many authors have confirmed the presence of such dependencies [9, 12-15, 21, 32]. It should be mentioned, however, that most of these papers applied different definitions of MetS [9,[12][13][14]32], and in some there were also definitions of short sleep duration applied which was less than 6 h per night [15,21]. Long sleep duration (≥ 9 h) was connected with a higher risk of MetS, but only in the unadjusted model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some of them show a U-shaped relationship between sleep duration and the prevalence of MetS [10]. It has been shown in some papers that MetS is only associated with short sleep duration [12][13][14][15] or long sleep duration [16][17][18]. In another paper, however, there was no relationship found between sleep duration and the risk of MetS [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%