2017
DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short‐selling constraints and corporate payout policy

Abstract: This study shows that managers adjust corporate payout policies to counteract intensified short-selling pressures following the removal of a short-selling constraint. We use a controlled experiment, the Regulation SHO pilot program, to find that changing the short-selling rule brings small companies to increase cash dividends, but not to repurchase more shares. Because paying dividends is costly, it is acknowledged as a more reliable signal of stock undervaluation than share repurchase. While our evidence sugg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al . () take advantage of a US SEC pilot programme (2005–2007) that suspended the uptick rule for short selling for selected pilot firms, to argue that firms regard paying dividends as a more reliable signal of stock value than stock repurchases. These findings are consistent with the signalling hypothesis, whereby companies choose dividend payouts to signal their confidence in future growth.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al . () take advantage of a US SEC pilot programme (2005–2007) that suspended the uptick rule for short selling for selected pilot firms, to argue that firms regard paying dividends as a more reliable signal of stock value than stock repurchases. These findings are consistent with the signalling hypothesis, whereby companies choose dividend payouts to signal their confidence in future growth.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we combine two prior theoretical studies on short selling (Khanna and Mathews, 2012) and stakeholder relations (Almazan et al, 2017) and provide empirical evidence for their arguments. Chen et al (2019) show that U.S. firms increase cash dividends to counteract intensified short-selling pressures. Our evidence indicates that because paying dividends is costly and Chinese firms are in strong need of internal funds to seize growth opportunities, labor investment can be a specific channel for firms to show their prospects to outside investors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al . (2019) show that U.S. firms increase cash dividends to counteract intensified short‐selling pressures. Our evidence indicates that because paying dividends is costly and Chinese firms are in strong need of internal funds to seize growth opportunities, labor investment can be a specific channel for firms to show their prospects to outside investors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short selling plays an important role in the financial market, as it enhances the market's quality and liquidity. The implications of short selling have attracted much attention from academics, ranging from future return predictability to the real effects on corporate activity (see, e.g., Grullon et al ., 2015; Chen et al ., 2017). However, understanding short selling itself in terms of its determinants has received relatively less attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%