2012
DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2012.51.4.203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short Segment Screw Fixation without Fusion for Unstable Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Burst Fracture : A Prospective Study on Selective Consecutive Patients

Abstract: ObjectiveThe purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of screw fixation without bone fusion for unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fracture.MethodsNine patients younger than 40 years underwent screw fixation without bone fusion, following postural reduction using a soft roll at the involved vertebra, in cases of burst fracture. Their motor power was intact in spite of severe canal compromise. The surgical procedure included postural reduction for 3 days and screw fixations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, screw loosening or vertebral collapse may occur more frequently after screw fixation without bone fusion in osteoporotic or osteopenic spines. However, insertion of pedicle screws at the fracture level results in a segmental construct that improves biomechanical stability by protecting the fractured body and by supporting the anterior column indirectly3). In addition, the insertion of bone cement to augment pedicle screws at the fracture level probably results in a segmental construct with improved biomechanical stability by providing protection to the fractured vertebral body and indirectly supporting the anterior column3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, screw loosening or vertebral collapse may occur more frequently after screw fixation without bone fusion in osteoporotic or osteopenic spines. However, insertion of pedicle screws at the fracture level results in a segmental construct that improves biomechanical stability by protecting the fractured body and by supporting the anterior column indirectly3). In addition, the insertion of bone cement to augment pedicle screws at the fracture level probably results in a segmental construct with improved biomechanical stability by providing protection to the fractured vertebral body and indirectly supporting the anterior column3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, insertion of pedicle screws at the fracture level results in a segmental construct that improves biomechanical stability by protecting the fractured body and by supporting the anterior column indirectly3). In addition, the insertion of bone cement to augment pedicle screws at the fracture level probably results in a segmental construct with improved biomechanical stability by providing protection to the fractured vertebral body and indirectly supporting the anterior column3). Furthermore, Bone cement augmentation at fractured level itself and adjacent vertebrae can significantly reduce pedicle screw bending and increase initial stiffness in the flexion-extension plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al suggested that short-segment pedicle screw fixation without bone fusion following postural reduction can be an effective and safe operative technique in the management of selected young patients with unstable burst fracture [21]. A 10-year follow-up study by Toyone et al suggested that the benefit of short-segment fixation without fusion for burst fractures involving neurological deficit is that it can preserve thoracolumbar motion without resulting in post-traumatic disc degeneration [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kyphosis angle (Cobb angle [9]) was measured from the superior end plate of the vertebral body just above the fracture to the inferior end plate of the fractured vertebral body. The percentage of vertebral body height loss was reported as fractions of anterior height between fractured vertebra and normal height of the adjacent vertebra below the fractured vertebra [10]. Other parameters of interest were the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score [11], Frankel grade and adjacent segment degeneration (University of California at Los Angeles Grading Scale [12]), which were also evaluated at final follow-up.…”
Section: Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%