2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short run and long run causality in time series: inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
179
0
29

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(48 reference statements)
8
179
0
29
Order By: Relevance
“…We are not interested in causality in a longer horizon, because, as Dufour and Renault [1998] and Dufour, Pelletier, and Renault [2006] show, in the financial market, if there is no causality between } { t X and } { t Y , it will be difficult to explore Granger causality in a longer horizon. As a consequence of the development of information technology, the impact of information in one market has the most significant effects in a short run.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are not interested in causality in a longer horizon, because, as Dufour and Renault [1998] and Dufour, Pelletier, and Renault [2006] show, in the financial market, if there is no causality between } { t X and } { t Y , it will be difficult to explore Granger causality in a longer horizon. As a consequence of the development of information technology, the impact of information in one market has the most significant effects in a short run.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard errors (S.E.) in all equations are based on the Newey-West estimator of the variance-covariance matrix (see, Dufour, Pelletier and Renault [35]). …”
Section: Impact Of News Releasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rejecting non-causality hypotheses in statistical tests implies that certain variables can help in forecasting others [Dufour et al (2006)]. Of course, statistical significance depends on the data sets and test power, and the outcomes of such tests do not represent the magnitude of causality.…”
Section: Measuring Causality Across Horizonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examine the causal relationship between commodity prices and nominal exchange rates for three commodity currencies (Canada, Australia, Chile) and three commodity spot prices (crude oil, copper and gold), using daily data (and 5-minute data, for Canada). In view of the incomplete nature of causality at only one horizon, we study and compare causality at different horizons as proposed in Dufour and Renault (1998) and Dufour, Pelletier and Renault (2006). Further, to avoid the overly simplifying features of pure significance tests for non-causality, we compute measures at many horizons because they allow one to assess in a much more precise way the underlying linkages when causality at different horizons in different directions is present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%