2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-rotation forestry of birch, maple, poplar and willow in Flanders (Belgium) II. Energy production and CO2 emission reduction potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The humidity of weeping birch wood and the bark of weeping birch were very similar, and the mass fraction of bark of 5% and 10%, alternatively, did not have a significant effect on the moisture of biofuels. The combustion heat and calorific value of the test samples of weeping birch wood were comparable with the results described in previous works (Jandacka et al 2007;Walle et al 2007;Dzurenda and Jandačka 2010 (Kurschner 1952;Garcia et al 2012;Owens and Cooley 2013); that the ash content of birch bark is about three times higher than the ash content of birch wood without bark. The mass fraction of birch bark of 5% and 10%, alternately, proportionately increased ash content compared with samples of birch wood without bark.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The humidity of weeping birch wood and the bark of weeping birch were very similar, and the mass fraction of bark of 5% and 10%, alternatively, did not have a significant effect on the moisture of biofuels. The combustion heat and calorific value of the test samples of weeping birch wood were comparable with the results described in previous works (Jandacka et al 2007;Walle et al 2007;Dzurenda and Jandačka 2010 (Kurschner 1952;Garcia et al 2012;Owens and Cooley 2013); that the ash content of birch bark is about three times higher than the ash content of birch wood without bark. The mass fraction of birch bark of 5% and 10%, alternately, proportionately increased ash content compared with samples of birch wood without bark.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For thermal uses, the biomass energy was determined by the low heating value (LHV, kJ kg −1 ), calculated using expression (13) from the high heating value (HHV, kJ kg −1 ) and the proportion of hydrogen in the dry matter ( H ,%) reported for this species (Klasnja et al ., ; Demirbas, ; Sannigrahi et al ., ). A weight loss factor relative to fermentation, drying and chipping of 0.85 was considered (Vande Walle et al ., ), and an efficiency conversion factor of 0.9 and 0.24 were considered for thermal and electric energy generation using the Rankine cycle. LHV=HHV(2442·9H100). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using willow biomass for the production of bioenergy as a substitute for energy produced from fossil fuels has a positive GHG balance and reduces the greenhouse effect [59,60]. A study of Kimming et al [61] shows that production of heat and electricity for 150 household village in Sweden can reduce greenhouse gas emissions considerably compared to the natural gas-based system.…”
Section: Global Warmingmentioning
confidence: 99%