2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.06.980458
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-range, orientation-reversing template-switching events occur at a high frequency in the human and yeast genomes

Abstract: 20The identification of structural variations in genomes using next-generation sequencing approaches 21 greatly facilitates the study of genetic and genomic diseases. The data generated using these 22 approaches also provide interesting new means to examine DNA repair, recombination, and 23 replication to better understand sources of genomic instability. To better utilize this data, we 24 developed SCARR (Systematic Combination of Alignments to Recreate Rearrangements) to identify 25 DNA rearrangements, and us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While a process of template switching can occur locally as a mechanism to bypass DNA lesions during replication, it is traditionally considered an error-free pathway mediated by proliferating cell nuclear antigen polyubiquitination, in which replication proceeds in the same direction as the nascent strand following the formation of a hemicatenane structure with the newly synthesised sister chromatid [ 10 12 ]. However, error-prone reverse-oriented template switching has now been observed in multiple eukaryotes including humans [ 13 , 14 ], and has been shown to leave a footprint of clustered mutagenesis in the human genome [ 15 ]. Despite our understanding of these individual mechanisms, computationally capturing their mutational footprints in an evolutionary context remains difficult, especially when focusing on local mutational mechanisms, which may present as a plausible cluster of accumulated substitutions and indels within a sequence alignment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a process of template switching can occur locally as a mechanism to bypass DNA lesions during replication, it is traditionally considered an error-free pathway mediated by proliferating cell nuclear antigen polyubiquitination, in which replication proceeds in the same direction as the nascent strand following the formation of a hemicatenane structure with the newly synthesised sister chromatid [ 10 12 ]. However, error-prone reverse-oriented template switching has now been observed in multiple eukaryotes including humans [ 13 , 14 ], and has been shown to leave a footprint of clustered mutagenesis in the human genome [ 15 ]. Despite our understanding of these individual mechanisms, computationally capturing their mutational footprints in an evolutionary context remains difficult, especially when focusing on local mutational mechanisms, which may present as a plausible cluster of accumulated substitutions and indels within a sequence alignment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a process of template switching can occur locally as a mechanism to bypass DNA lesions during replication, it is traditionally considered an error-free pathway mediated by proliferating cell nuclear antigen polyubiquitination, in which replication proceeds in the same direction as the nascent strand following the formation of a hemicatenane structure with the newly synthesised sister chromatid (10)(11)(12). However, error-prone reverse-oriented template switching has now been observed in multiple eukaryotes including humans (13,14), and has been shown to leave a footprint of clustered mutagenesis in the human genome (15). Despite our understanding of these individual mechanisms, computationally capturing their mutational footprints in an evolutionary context remains difficult, especially when focusing on local mutational mechanisms, which may present as a plausible cluster of accumulated substitutions and indels within a sequence alignment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%