2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2010.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short protocol for the study of paediatric patients with suspected betalactam antibiotic hypersensitivity and low risk criteria

Abstract: Direct oral provocation in low risk patients has been shown to be effective and safe in discarding hypersensitivity to betalactam antibiotics in the majority of the patients studied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Skin prick and ID tests were performed to this patient after positive OPT and were negative. A second OPT was also performed, and the same reaction occurred again confirming the diagnosis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Skin prick and ID tests were performed to this patient after positive OPT and were negative. A second OPT was also performed, and the same reaction occurred again confirming the diagnosis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Also these tests are difficult to perform, time-consuming, and cause pain in children. Because of these disadvantages, some studies inves- (25). Oral provocation tests are the gold standard for the diagnosis of non-immediate beta-lactam hypersensitivity (6,10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that most children (more than 90%) are not confirmed as allergic, this algorithm is heavily resource‐intensive and time‐consuming or could even lead to a number of wrong diagnoses of drug hypersensitivity due to uncertain predictive values of skin tests. In recent years, a number of papers have challenged the academic guidelines and have explored the feasibility of performing OPT without skin tests in children with suspicion of a benign non‐immediate reaction . In spite of reported good results, economic savings, and observed satisfaction by parents and doctors, this attitude is still debated and some authors still consider performing intradermal tests, mainly due to fear of severe reactions during OPT .…”
Section: What To Do With a Child With Suspected Blh In A Specialized mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a number of papers have challenged the academic guidelines and have explored the feasibility of performing OPT without skin tests in children with suspicion of a benign non-immediate reaction. 4,[6][7][8][9] In spite of reported good results, economic savings, and observed satisfaction by parents and doctors, this attitude is still debated and some authors still consider performing intradermal tests, mainly due to fear of severe reactions during OPT. 10 As a result, in current clinical practice, things are not so clear and very different approaches are followed by practicing clinicians.…”
Section: What To Do With a Child With Suspected Blh In A Specializementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, intradermal tests (IDTs), which are more sensitive than prick tests, are painful and can be poorly tolerated by small children. Thus, for nonimmediate reactions, such as mild exanthemas, it has been proposed to perform drug provocation tests (DPT) without prior skin tests .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%