2022
DOI: 10.1017/s0963548322000013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short proofs for long induced paths

Abstract: We present a modification of the Depth first search algorithm, suited for finding long induced paths. We use it to give simple proofs of the following results. We show that the induced size-Ramsey number of paths satisfies $\hat{R}_{\mathrm{ind}}(P_n)\leq 5 \cdot 10^7n$ , thus giving an explicit constant in the linear bound, improving the previous bound with a large constant from a regularity lemma argument by Haxell, Kohayakawa and Łuczak. We also provide a bound for the k-colour … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For paths it is known that Ω(k 2 )n ≤ rk (P n ) ≤ O(k 2 log k)n (see [10,24] for the lower bound and [9,25] for the upper bound). In the induced case, by a recent result of Draganić, Krivelevich and Glock [6], we have that rk ind (P n ) ≤ O(k 3 log 4 k)n. For cycles, the discrepancy between the size-Ramsey and the induced size-Ramsey number is significantly larger. Indeed, by a recent result of Javadi and Miralaei [20], which improved another recent result by Javadi, Khoeini, Omidi and Pokrovskiy [19], we have r k (C n ) = O(k 120 log 2 k)n for even n, and r k (C n ) = O(2 16k 2 +2 log k )n for odd n. On the other hand, the only known upper bound on the induced size-Ramsey numbers of cycles was obtained in the seminal paper of Haxell, Kohayakawa and Łuczak [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For paths it is known that Ω(k 2 )n ≤ rk (P n ) ≤ O(k 2 log k)n (see [10,24] for the lower bound and [9,25] for the upper bound). In the induced case, by a recent result of Draganić, Krivelevich and Glock [6], we have that rk ind (P n ) ≤ O(k 3 log 4 k)n. For cycles, the discrepancy between the size-Ramsey and the induced size-Ramsey number is significantly larger. Indeed, by a recent result of Javadi and Miralaei [20], which improved another recent result by Javadi, Khoeini, Omidi and Pokrovskiy [19], we have r k (C n ) = O(k 120 log 2 k)n for even n, and r k (C n ) = O(2 16k 2 +2 log k )n for odd n. On the other hand, the only known upper bound on the induced size-Ramsey numbers of cycles was obtained in the seminal paper of Haxell, Kohayakawa and Łuczak [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Further, we also know that it is locally sparse, that is, all sets U of size |U | ≤ εN span at most 3 2 |U | edges, where ε > 0 is some constant depending on C. We consider the subgraph corresponding to the densest colour class, say red and using a result of Krivelevich [24], we find inside it a large expanding subgraph G . Draganić, Glock and Krivelevich [6] showed using a modified DFS algorithm that under the given assumptions, G has a red induced path of length 2n/5 and we adapt their argument to our setting. Given such a red induced path of length 2n/5, from the endpoints we construct two trees T 1 , T 2 each of depth O(log N ) and with Ω(εN ) leaves.…”
Section: Proof Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations