“…In contrast, full thickness implants, where the integrity of host endothelium is compromised, depend upon minimising the wound healing response and development of opaque scar tissue (retro‐corneal membrane [RCM] formation) to retain transparency. Accordingly, lamellar implants have enjoyed some degree of success (P. Fagerholm et al, ; Islam et al, ; Jangamreddy et al, ), whereas full thickness implants do not remain clear due to RCM formation in many cases (Hicks & Hamilton, ; Obata & Tsuru, ; Rajendran, Netuková, Griffith, Forrester, & Kuffová, ; Yum, Kim, & Kim, ). However, they can function as tectonic grafts allowing preservation of the eye in the case of a nonhealing wound and later replacement with a full thickness, endothelium‐intact, penetrating allograft.…”