1990
DOI: 10.1093/comjnl/33.5.471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short Note: A Note on the Expected Behaviour of Binary Tree Traversals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; and the nodes can be traversed in different orders: inorder, preorder, postorder, breath-first, depth-first, etc. ; see [2,10,11,12,22,23,31,50,64] and [30]. The analysis of the cost of these algorithms then reduces to the calculation of certain parameters on trees such as the number of nodes with null (or non-null) left (or right) branches, the number of nodes with both non-null left and right branches, and the number of nodes that are a left child and whose right branch is not empty.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; and the nodes can be traversed in different orders: inorder, preorder, postorder, breath-first, depth-first, etc. ; see [2,10,11,12,22,23,31,50,64] and [30]. The analysis of the cost of these algorithms then reduces to the calculation of certain parameters on trees such as the number of nodes with null (or non-null) left (or right) branches, the number of nodes with both non-null left and right branches, and the number of nodes that are a left child and whose right branch is not empty.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%