2004
DOI: 10.1021/ja030658n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short Lexitropsin that Recognizes the DNA Minor Groove at 5‘-ACTAGT-3‘:  Understanding the Role of Isopropyl-thiazole

Abstract: Isopropyl-thiazole ((iPr)Th) represents a new addition to the building blocks of nucleic acid minor groove-binding molecules. The DNA decamer duplex d(CGACTAGTCG)(2) is bound by a short lexitropsin of sequence formyl-PyPy(iPr)Th-Dp (where Py represents N-methyl pyrrole, (iPr)Th represents thiazole with an isopropyl group attached, and Dp represents dimethylaminopropyl). NMR data indicate ligand binding in the minor groove of DNA to the sequence 5'-ACT(5)AG(7)T-3' at a 2:1 ratio of ligand to DNA duplex. Ligand … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the 1 H NMR data for the complex between 1 and 5 0 -CGACTAGTCG-3 0 ( Figure 1a) had already established that minor groove binding occurs with a staggered 2:1, head-totail, side-by-side binding motif 16,17 at the indicated (underlined) reading frame. 11 The same characteristic NMR resonance pattern also occurs for the binding of 1 to both (Figure 1b,c, respectively), all of which produce outstanding quality twodimensional (2D) nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) NMR data sets. In stark contrast, the binding of 1 to 5 0 -d(CGCCTAGGCG)-3 0 can at best be described as "poor", being characterized by broad NMR resonances (Figure 1d) and ill-defined cross-peaks in 2D NOESY NMR spectra.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Analysis of the 1 H NMR data for the complex between 1 and 5 0 -CGACTAGTCG-3 0 ( Figure 1a) had already established that minor groove binding occurs with a staggered 2:1, head-totail, side-by-side binding motif 16,17 at the indicated (underlined) reading frame. 11 The same characteristic NMR resonance pattern also occurs for the binding of 1 to both (Figure 1b,c, respectively), all of which produce outstanding quality twodimensional (2D) nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) NMR data sets. In stark contrast, the binding of 1 to 5 0 -d(CGCCTAGGCG)-3 0 can at best be described as "poor", being characterized by broad NMR resonances (Figure 1d) and ill-defined cross-peaks in 2D NOESY NMR spectra.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…[14] Further structural and energetic investigations by NMR spectroscopy and ITC for the same ligand with other DNA sequences revealed additional key features that were responsible for stable complex formation and factors (particularly steric) that readily destabilise complex formation. [17] In an extension to these studies, we report here structures of the DNA complexes formed by both thiazotropsin B and AIK-18/51, thus allowing comparisons between all three complexes to be made.…”
Section: Structure Elucidation and Analysis Of Ligand-dna Complexesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Their free solution behaviour and their respective DNA complexes have been studied to establish how structural and functional alterations to the ligand affect the formation and stability of their DNA complexes. DNase I footprinting, [13] ITC [20] and NMR spectroscopy [14] studies previously showed thiazotropsin A to bind to the hexanucleotide 5'-ACTAGT-3'. Replacing one of the N-methylpyrrole groups of thiazotropsin A with N-methylimidazole, to form thiazotropsin B, changes the preferred binding sequence to 5'-(A/T)CGCG(T/A)-3'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, we carried out the energy analysis of the molecular binding between seven MGB ligands, the complex structures of which were studied relatively well [10][11][12][13][14][15][16], and DNA following the dimer mechanism. This makes it possible to carry out the energy calculations for dimer structures corresponding to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis data and directly "cut out" from experimentally determined dimer-DNA structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%