2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short implants—an analysis of longitudinal studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
154
1
39

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
154
1
39
Order By: Relevance
“…An implant length/diameter of 10 mm/3.75 mm was reported to be a potential threshold in determining the risk of unfavorable biomechanical behavior (20)(21)(22). From a biomechanical perspective, under vertical loading, minimum and maximum principal stress values around the implant neck were acceptable at every diameter for implants with a BIC ratio of 98.2%.…”
Section: Vertical Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An implant length/diameter of 10 mm/3.75 mm was reported to be a potential threshold in determining the risk of unfavorable biomechanical behavior (20)(21)(22). From a biomechanical perspective, under vertical loading, minimum and maximum principal stress values around the implant neck were acceptable at every diameter for implants with a BIC ratio of 98.2%.…”
Section: Vertical Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the studies included in this review associate short and wide implants. 13 Previous biomechanical test showed that an increase of the implant diameter resulted in more homogeneous stress distribution and less stress concentration on the implants, 27 besides minimize complications, 25,26 and might guarantee the conservation of marginal peri-implant bone level. 34 Short-wide implants provides an increased implant-bone contact area and could make a short implant comparable to a longer implant with a smaller diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cumulative success of rough-surface implants is greater than that of machined-surface implants, especially for short implants. 21,23,24 Moreover, the increase in the diameter of implants could help minimize complications 12,25,26 since a large implant diameter might result in more homogeneous stress distribution and less stress concentration on the implants. 27 Most studies with short implants involve partially edentulous patients or those who require a single tooth replacement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atualmente, os implantes de comprimento abaixo de 8 mm tornaram possível evitar que os pacientes passem por procedimentos cirúrgicos de alta complexidade e morbidade, tais como enxertos ósseos extensos, lateralização de nervo alveolar inferior e distrações osteogênicas (das Neves et al, 2006;Morand e Irinakis, 2007;Ogawa et al, 2010).…”
Section: Uso De Implantes Com Comprimento Reduzidounclassified
“…Os implantes denominados como curtos é um tanto quanto subjetivo (das Neves et al, 2006). Alguns autores definem implantes curtos como aqueles menores que 7 mm (Johns et al, 1992;Friberg et al, 2000).…”
Section: Uso De Implantes Com Comprimento Reduzidounclassified