2022
DOI: 10.1111/btp.13090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short flowers for long tongues: Functional specialization in a nocturnal pollination network of an asclepiad in long‐tongued hawkmoths

Abstract: Since Darwin, very long and narrow floral tubes have been known to represent the main floral morphological feature for specialized long‐tongued hawkmoth pollination. However, specialization may be driven by other contrivances instead of floral tube morphology. Asclepiads are plants with a complex floral morphology where primary hawkmoth pollination had never been described. We detailed here the intricate pollination mechanism of the South American asclepiad Schubertia grandiflora, where functional specializati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The floral mechanism thus explains the unusual mismatch in traits, with the corolla tube being shorter than the proboscis of the pollinators. Similar mismatches where the tube is shorter than the hawkmoth pollinator proboscis have been recorded in other plants with proboscis placement of pollen such as Erica cylindrica (Ericaeae) (Van der Niet & Cozien, 2022) and Harveya speciosa (Orobanchaceae) (Johnson & Raguso, 2016), Mandevilla laxa (Apocynaceae) (Moré et al., 2007) and Schubertia grandiflora (Apocynaceae) (Amorim et al., 2022). Some authors have attributed flower depth‐pollinator proboscis trait mismatches to degree of specialization or ecological dependency of interactions (Anderson, Terblanche, et al., 2010), but a much simpler explanation is that flowers with proboscis placement of pollen are not functionally required to precisely match or exceed the length of the proboscis of their pollinators.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The floral mechanism thus explains the unusual mismatch in traits, with the corolla tube being shorter than the proboscis of the pollinators. Similar mismatches where the tube is shorter than the hawkmoth pollinator proboscis have been recorded in other plants with proboscis placement of pollen such as Erica cylindrica (Ericaeae) (Van der Niet & Cozien, 2022) and Harveya speciosa (Orobanchaceae) (Johnson & Raguso, 2016), Mandevilla laxa (Apocynaceae) (Moré et al., 2007) and Schubertia grandiflora (Apocynaceae) (Amorim et al., 2022). Some authors have attributed flower depth‐pollinator proboscis trait mismatches to degree of specialization or ecological dependency of interactions (Anderson, Terblanche, et al., 2010), but a much simpler explanation is that flowers with proboscis placement of pollen are not functionally required to precisely match or exceed the length of the proboscis of their pollinators.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Mandevilla laxa (Apocynaceae) (Moré et al, 2007) and Schubertia grandiflora (Apocynaceae) (Amorim et al, 2022). Some authors have attributed flower depth-pollinator proboscis trait mismatches to degree of specialization or ecological dependency of interactions (Anderson, Terblanche, et al, 2010), but a much simpler explanation is that flowers with proboscis placement of pollen are not functionally required to precisely match or exceed the length of the proboscis of their pollinators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the flowering seasons of S. fungiforme (from May to August) in 2020 and 2021, we used four IR motion‐activated cameras (as in Amorim, Marino, et al, 2022) to record the floral visitors of S. fungiforme . We focused on three remnants of the Seasonal Atlantic Forest in the state of São Paulo, Brazil (Appendix S1: Figure S1).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, employing ICTs with a time‐lapse trigger is an effective and practical approach toward monitoring ground‐dwelling invertebrates in fields with a precise temporal ecological niche across diverse monitoring durations (Burks et al., 2022 ; Johnson et al., 2020 ). In recent years, researchers have recommended the use of ICTs to survey ectothermic animals (Corva et al., 2023 ), including invertebrates (Amorim et al., 2022 ) in fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%