The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(16)01478-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short Duration Treatment with Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir plus GS-9857 in Treatment-Naive Genotype 1-6 HCV-Infected Patients with or without Cirrhosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Small studies have evaluated adding the pangenotypic protease inhibitor GS-9857 to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. In non-cirrhotic patients, this triple combination given for only 6 weeks led to SVR in all 21 genotype 3 treatment-naïve patients treated, and was also highly effective across all genotypes when given for 8 weeks [57]. Extending the duration to 12 weeks in treatment-experienced patients with or without cirrhosis led to SVR in 34 of 35 (97%) patients [58].…”
Section: Genotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small studies have evaluated adding the pangenotypic protease inhibitor GS-9857 to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. In non-cirrhotic patients, this triple combination given for only 6 weeks led to SVR in all 21 genotype 3 treatment-naïve patients treated, and was also highly effective across all genotypes when given for 8 weeks [57]. Extending the duration to 12 weeks in treatment-experienced patients with or without cirrhosis led to SVR in 34 of 35 (97%) patients [58].…”
Section: Genotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of this study include the low number of patients enrolled per treatment arm, particularly treatment‐experienced patients with cirrhosis. However, other pilot studies investigating short treatment durations, including those with genotype 2 infection, had similarly limited numbers of patients enrolled, and yielded comparably low SVR12 rates . Another limitation of the current study is that OBV/PTV/r + SOF was not evaluated without RBV in genotype 3‐infected patients with cirrhosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, other pilot studies investigating short treatment durations, including those with genotype 2 infection, had similarly limited numbers of patients enrolled, and yielded comparably low SVR12 rates. [29][30][31][32] Another limitation of the current study is that OBV/PTV/r + SOF was not evaluated without RBV in genotype 3-infected patients with cirrhosis. The results of the C-ISLE study as well as the POLARIS-3 study 33 suggest that RBV may not be needed when a regimen comprising these three mechanisms of action is used in genotype 3-infected patients with cirrhosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a phase 2 study, 6 weeks of sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and GS-9857 in 21 treatment-naïve patients with cirrhosis resulted in an SVR rate of 100%. 24 In cirrhotic patients treated for eight weeks with this regimen, the SVR was 94% (17/18). 24…”
Section: Daa Therapy In Treatment-naïve Gt3 Hcv Patientsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In a phase 2 study, 6 weeks of sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and GS-9857 in 21 treatmentnaïve patients with cirrhosis resulted in an SVR rate of 100%. 24 In cirrhotic patients treated for eight weeks with this regimen, the SVR was 94% (17/18). 24 Sofosbuvir in addition to ombitasvir, an NS5A inhibitor, and ritonavir-boosted paritaprevir, an NS3/4A protease inhibitor, may be yet another option for the treatment of GT3 patients.…”
Section: Daa Therapy In Treatment-naïve Gt3 Hcv Patientsmentioning
confidence: 94%