2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2106.13222
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-distance constraints for the longitudinal component of the hadronic light-by-light amplitude: an update

Gilberto Colangelo,
Franziska Hagelstein,
Martin Hoferichter
et al.

Abstract: We reassess the impact of short-distance constraints for the longitudinal component of the hadronic light-by-light amplitude on the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, a µ = (g−2) µ /2, by comparing different solutions that have recently appeared in the literature. In particular, we analyze the relevance of the exact axial anomaly and its impact on a µ and conclude that it remains rather limited. We show that all recently proposed solutions agree well within uncertainties on the numerical estimate of the im… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This model was, however, not meant primarily as a phenomenological model for estimating the contributions of excited pseudoscalars but rather as a model for estimating the effects of the longitudinal SDCs, which according to the hQCD models are instead provided by the axial vector mesons. As far as these effects are concerned, our present results are not far above the estimates obtained in [24,25,46,47]; all are significantly below the estimates obtained with the so-called MV model [8], where the ground-state pion contribution is modified.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…This model was, however, not meant primarily as a phenomenological model for estimating the contributions of excited pseudoscalars but rather as a model for estimating the effects of the longitudinal SDCs, which according to the hQCD models are instead provided by the axial vector mesons. As far as these effects are concerned, our present results are not far above the estimates obtained in [24,25,46,47]; all are significantly below the estimates obtained with the so-called MV model [8], where the ground-state pion contribution is modified.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The latter results (with or without 2 the excited pseudoscalar contributions) could be compared to the WP [3] values attributed to the axial sector and contributions related to the SDC, a WP,axials µ = 6(6) × 10 −11 and a WP,SDC µ = 15(10) × 10 −11 , which with linearly added errors gives 21(16) × 10 −11 , which is significantly smaller. While the estimates for the SDC contribution is more or less compatible [106,107], the main difference comes from the (transverse) contribution of axial vector mesons. The holographic QCD results thus 1 The fact that the higher axial vector meson modes do not become more important for HW2(UV-fit) has to do with the relatively large masses of excited axial vector mesons in this case (m HW1 [38]).…”
Section: Results For the Hlbl Contribution To A µmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Interestingly, the holographic models also predict a more sizeable axialmeson contribution than previously estimated (see e.g. [39] for a detailed comparison). This conclusion has been shown to be solid even in the presence of quark-mass corrections [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%