2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.94.054507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-distance charmonium correlator on the lattice with Möbius domain-wall fermion and a determination of charm quark mass

Abstract: We calculate charmonium correlators on the lattice with 2+1-flavors of sea quarks and charm valence quark both described by the Möbius domain-wall fermion. Temporal moments of the correlators are calculated and matched to perturbative QCD formulae to extract the charm quark mass m c (µ) and strong coupling constant α s (µ). Lattice data at three lattice spacings, 0.044, 0.055, and 0.080 fm, are extrapolated to the continuum limit. The correlators in the vector channel are confirmed to be consistent with the ex… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
122
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
14
122
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[8] estimates the perturbative uncertainty on α s from the M P,0 c moment by varying the renormalization scales setting 2 GeV ≤ µ α = µ m ≤ 4 GeV. The result 0.1174 (12) is quoted, with a central value in good agreement with our result in Table 9, but with a smaller error. If we use a correlated scale variation (taking the charm quark mass as the lowest scale) we obtain 0.1178 ± (0.0011) total , which has a very similar total uncertainty.…”
Section: Comparison To Previous Lattice Determinationssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[8] estimates the perturbative uncertainty on α s from the M P,0 c moment by varying the renormalization scales setting 2 GeV ≤ µ α = µ m ≤ 4 GeV. The result 0.1174 (12) is quoted, with a central value in good agreement with our result in Table 9, but with a smaller error. If we use a correlated scale variation (taking the charm quark mass as the lowest scale) we obtain 0.1178 ± (0.0011) total , which has a very similar total uncertainty.…”
Section: Comparison To Previous Lattice Determinationssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Nakayama et al [12] 1 0.1163 0.0018 0.0007 0.0003 0.0006 0.0020 2 0.1152 0.0018 0.0006 0.0003 0.0008 0.0021 Table 10. α (n f =5) s (m Z ) determination from ratios of charm pseudo-scalar correlator moments R P,n c .…”
Section: α S From Lattice Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our result also agrees very well with those from lattice simulations based on the pseudo-scalar current [19], domain-wall fermions [20], and staggered quarks [21]. In summary, we used a physically motivated continuum ansatz that reproduces the experimental data, both the normalisation and -non-trivially and very importantly -the moment dependence, with a single adjustable parameter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Details of the lattice parameters are in [5], where a full description of this work is available. The same set of lattice ensembles is also used for calculations of other physical quantities such as the η meson mass [6], charm quark mass [7], short-distance current correlator [8,9], as well as heavy-light meson decay constants [10] and semileptonic decay form factors [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%