2022
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.839339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Course or Total Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer - Current Status and Future Perspectives

Abstract: Neoadjuvant therapy improves overall survival compared with a surgery-first approach in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). Evidence of higher quality is required to determine whether neoadjuvant therapy has potential benefits and improves survival for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC). Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have explored short-course neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SNT), but total neoadjuvant chemotherapy (TNT) is now the experimental arm of ongoing RCTs. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of studies on neoadjuvant treatment of pancreatic cancer concentrate on radiographic prediction of resectability or rates of radiographic downstaging rather than attempting to identify possible functional predictors of tumor response (20)(21)(22). There is an absence of effective imaging techniques and serological biomarkers for the assessment of tumor response for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (23). Gauging the tumor microenvironment (TME) heterogeneities, particularly vasculature and function, i.e., tumor oxygenation status, at high resolution is needed to both evaluate treatment response and predict recurrence at an early phase during treatment (24).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies on neoadjuvant treatment of pancreatic cancer concentrate on radiographic prediction of resectability or rates of radiographic downstaging rather than attempting to identify possible functional predictors of tumor response (20)(21)(22). There is an absence of effective imaging techniques and serological biomarkers for the assessment of tumor response for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (23). Gauging the tumor microenvironment (TME) heterogeneities, particularly vasculature and function, i.e., tumor oxygenation status, at high resolution is needed to both evaluate treatment response and predict recurrence at an early phase during treatment (24).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we assumed that neoadjuvant treatment would have been a viable alternative in case of a futile up-front pancreatectomy . In this framework, the 6-month time mark corresponds to the immortal time relative to a neoadjuvant therapy course in previous trials and landmark analyses …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While findings from RCTs of adjuvant chemotherapy given to patients receiving upfront surgery have suggested that the ideal time frame for perioperative systemic chemotherapy is 6 mo[ 52 ], there is no agreement on the length and cycle of NAT for BRPC patients. To make this decision, NAT endpoints will need to be defined to assess responsiveness and tumor re-staging during treatment.…”
Section: Nat For Brpcmentioning
confidence: 99%