2016
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short communication: Partial replacement of ground corn with algae meal in a dairy cow diet: Milk yield and composition, nutrient digestibility, and metabolic profile

Abstract: This study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of partially replacing dietary ground corn with a microalgae meal from Prototheca moriformis (composed of deoiled microalgae and soyhulls) on milk yield and composition, nutrient intake, total-tract apparent digestibility, and blood profile of lactating dairy cows. Twenty multiparous Holstein cows (57.7±49.4d in milk, 25.3±5.3 of milk yield, and 590±71kg of live weight at the start of experiment, mean ± standard deviation) were used in a cross-over design exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduction in diet acceptability when microalgae are supplied to lactating cows has been reported in the literature (Franklin et al, 1999;Lamminen et al, 2017); nevertheless, in our study, all corn supplements were ingested by cows in both treatments. No significant differences for inclusion of microalgae (91.8 g/cow/day) on daily production, milk solids content or production was also observed by Da Silva et al (2016). Similar results were also observed with supplementation of protected microalgae, without change in dry matter intake or milk yield, while milk fat percentage was reduced (Vahmani et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Reduction in diet acceptability when microalgae are supplied to lactating cows has been reported in the literature (Franklin et al, 1999;Lamminen et al, 2017); nevertheless, in our study, all corn supplements were ingested by cows in both treatments. No significant differences for inclusion of microalgae (91.8 g/cow/day) on daily production, milk solids content or production was also observed by Da Silva et al (2016). Similar results were also observed with supplementation of protected microalgae, without change in dry matter intake or milk yield, while milk fat percentage was reduced (Vahmani et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was analyzed using a method by Van Soest et al (1991). Meanwhile, the nutrient composition of yak milk was also measured in accordance with the previous description (da Silva et al, 2016) and given in Supplementary Table S2.…”
Section: Animals and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, multiple factors including environment, host and microbiome, and—most importantly in our context—interactions among nutrients result in nutrient requirements, nutrient bioavailability, and health outcomes. Advanced separation and analytical techniques, such as multi-nutrient profiling (Meisser Redeuil et al, 2015 ) and metabolomics (da Silva et al, 2016 ; Guiraud et al, 2017 ), have only recently enabled the comprehensive and high-throughput analysis of food components and their availability in physiological tissues. The high analytical sensitivity and broad analyte coverage of latest mass spectrometric nutrient and metabolite profiling, combined with a more holistic view of micronutrient status, only now renders exosome micronutrient profiling possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%