2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short communication: Gut microbial colonization of the mouse colon using faecal transfer was equally effective when comparing rectal inoculation and oral inoculation based on 16S rRNA sequencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been previously speculated that as oral gavage inoculum needs to pass through the acidic stomach environment, rectal administration may be more e cient 21 . However, a previous study of FMT in mice showed that speci c pathogen-free mice treated with antibiotics and then orally or rectally inoculated with donor mice gut microbiota had no differences in microbial community after inoculation 22 . As such, while rectal administration is preferable in e cacy and safety outcomes for clinical FMT use, oral gavage is often selected in mouse studies, presumably due to convenience 23 .…”
Section: Recipient Preparation and Fmt Administrationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It has been previously speculated that as oral gavage inoculum needs to pass through the acidic stomach environment, rectal administration may be more e cient 21 . However, a previous study of FMT in mice showed that speci c pathogen-free mice treated with antibiotics and then orally or rectally inoculated with donor mice gut microbiota had no differences in microbial community after inoculation 22 . As such, while rectal administration is preferable in e cacy and safety outcomes for clinical FMT use, oral gavage is often selected in mouse studies, presumably due to convenience 23 .…”
Section: Recipient Preparation and Fmt Administrationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…One of the distinguishing features of IBS is the imbalance of intestinal flora, therefore reestablishing a healthy intestinal environment is of paramount importance to sufferers. FMT can control the intestinal state, enhance the barrier of the gastrointestinal mucosa, and aid in the reconstruction of the body's micro-ecosystem [9]. After therapy with FMT, the amount of lactobacilli in the feces increased from 5.5 CFU/g to 8.9 CFU/g and the number of bifidobacteria increased from 7.4 CFU/g to 8.9 CFU/g in a study including 42 individuals with IBS-D [10].…”
Section: Re-establishing the Intestinal Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 21 However, a previous study of FMT in mice showed that specific pathogen-free mice treated with antibiotics and then orally or rectally inoculated with donor mice gut microbiota had no differences in microbial community after inoculation. 22 As such, while rectal administration is preferable in efficacy and safety outcomes for clinical FMT use, oral gavage is often selected in mouse studies, presumably due to convenience. 23 In line with these findings, the overwhelming majority of studies included in our analysis opted for oral administration (90.4%; Figure 2g ) and only a small number used rectal administration (2.9%).…”
Section: Data Extractedmentioning
confidence: 99%