2020
DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d210938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short Communication: Genetic polymorphism of registered and popularly cultivated coffee (Coffea spp.) in the Philippines using inter-simple sequence repeats markers

Abstract: Abstract. Panaligan AC, Baltazar MD, Alejandro GJD. 2020. Short Communication: Genetic polymorphism of registered and popularly cultivated coffee (Coffea spp.) in the Philippines using inter-simple sequence repeats markers. Biodiversitas 21: 4228-4233. Three Coffea species, namely Coffea arabica, Coffea canephora and Coffea liberica have been commercially cultivated in the Philippines. Genetic variability analysis of these species is important for the conservation of genetic resources and breeding programs. He… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…dewevrei 17,46 . Morphological and molecular data 37,42,[47][48][49] support the recognition of two varieties for C. liberica: var. liberica and var.…”
Section: Excelsa Coffeementioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…dewevrei 17,46 . Morphological and molecular data 37,42,[47][48][49] support the recognition of two varieties for C. liberica: var. liberica and var.…”
Section: Excelsa Coffeementioning
confidence: 73%
“…The apt epithet 'excelsa' has persisted and is still the most widely used common name for var. dewevrei 17,36,37,[47][48][49] . Excelsa is used in the remaining narrative for var.…”
Section: Excelsa Coffeementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was noteworthy to discover bands which were specific to either Liberica and Excelsa. Morphological differences in the leaf have been found between these two types (Cao et al 2014;Baltazar and Buot 2019), however genetic differences have been limited except for markers such as AFLPs (N'diaye et al 2005) and ISSRs (Panaligan et al 2020). It was also interesting to find a band specific to the Yellow Bourbon variety of Arabica.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The organellar genomes of Rubiaceae species have never been used as superbarcodes, and scientists have mainly worked with nuclear DNA fragments such as internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and single genes or regions of plastome: matK, trnH-psbA, rbcL, rps16, ndhF, petD, and trnT-trnF [60][61][62][63]. Normally, superbarcodes should be diverse enough to distinguish interspecies differences, so the mitochondrial genome is very rarely used in plant species delimitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%