1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(96)00714-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short- and long-term results with kidneys from non-heart-beating donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…from The Netherlands, as well as multiple other studies (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)14,(18)(19)(20), DCD kidneys in our study showed a statistically higher incidence of DGF. Despite this higher incidence of delayed function, there was no difference in 5-year graft or patient survival between DCD and DBD donor kidneys in our study.…”
Section: Uncontrolled Dcd Donorssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…from The Netherlands, as well as multiple other studies (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)14,(18)(19)(20), DCD kidneys in our study showed a statistically higher incidence of DGF. Despite this higher incidence of delayed function, there was no difference in 5-year graft or patient survival between DCD and DBD donor kidneys in our study.…”
Section: Uncontrolled Dcd Donorssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…More recently, kidneys from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors have been gaining acceptance. European centers, utilizing a greater percentage of DCD kidneys than the United States, have shown that these kidneys function with almost an equal efficacy as kidneys from donation after brain death (DBD) donors (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alonso and colleagues 46 argued that a still-to-be-defined allowable period of warm ischemia does not alter outcomes in NHB renal grafting. Although they reported significantly increased rates of delayed graft functioning in their NHB donor kidneys where WIT > 2 h, 3-month recovery rates were no different.…”
Section: Summaries Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most centers, maximal donor age is taken as 60 yr, WIT of 30 min without cardiac massage (absolute WIT) and an additional 120 min with satisfactory cardiopulmonary resuscitation (relative WIT) [8,9]. A few centers accept older (65 yr) donors and WIT of up to 45 min, despite the appreciation that those are important risk factors in delayed graft function amongst NHBD [10–12]. However, with the introduction of in situ perfusion and retrieval procedures, ischemic times of up to 4 h have been reported.…”
Section: Donor Acceptance Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria for donor death have generally included cardiac arrest unresponsive to cardiopulmonary resuscitation for at least 30 min, absence of any electrocardiographic activity 10 min after cessation of resuscitation, and no neurological activity after 15 min of normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass [13]. However, there are center‐to‐center variations [10,12,14].…”
Section: Donor Acceptance Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%